English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could the united nations mediating such talks help the groups involved talk to eachother because the U.N. has no favorite between them, bias for any one side or intrest in either side gaining an upperhand on the other? Aren't they about as close as can be found to a disintrested fair third party? Would this help the U.N. return to it's main role of peacemaker? I'm not sayying progress would be imidiate but it would at least be possible. Anyone find any faults in this idea? Hopefully well thought out reasonable rational logical ones?

2007-03-18 17:46:41 · 7 answers · asked by Stan S 1 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

I believe that the only solution for the civil war in Iraq is through negotiation, nothing will be accomplished militarily. Yes, that would be a good choice, and America should stay out of it as we are polarizing and we can offer no solution.

2007-03-18 17:53:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Sunni and Shiites are 2 faculties of concept interior Islam. They arent denominations. as an party, they dont have their personal mosques. and both can enter the others mosque to wish. (in spite of if in some parts of the international they could shop separate to prevent clashing) even if, there are some mild adjustments in praying and so on. Now the reason this kind of branch exists basically in the middle East is by way of the way historic past has affected them emotionally. Their way of life is interwoven with their faith. And at circumstances they cant make the excellence between both. Any muslim is regularly occurring with of that being a muslim includes following the life platforms of Quran and the Prophets Hadeeth (sayings). Shiites do even if flow a touch further and upload the Prophets Son in guidelines sayings in there as well. Theres no damage in doing this. because Ali replaced into an exemplary guy and the in person-friendly words guy who fathered the Prophets grandchildren. the present branch because the media shows, isn't something more advantageous than lack of information and absence of perspective on the elementary muslim. I as a Muslim should be both Sunni and Shiite. because i appreciate Ali and everybody who examine his life ought to love him too. yet as with each issues, the affection of a individual, could under no circumstances overshadow the affection we've for our author. And moderation in all issues, is emphasised many circumstances in Islam.

2016-11-26 21:47:01 · answer #2 · answered by sanda 4 · 0 0

No. There is no fault with the idea. UN as a peacemaker has been successful in the past and the same can be given a chance in Iraq provided there no external armies. They should first quit to convince the people of Iraq that UN and other nations are also serious.

2007-03-18 17:53:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

No the UN hasnt seucessfully mediated anything in the past 20 years without military inervention.

2007-03-18 18:26:22 · answer #4 · answered by firetdriver_99 5 · 0 1

the UN? That is nothing but a joke that is taking up some valuable property in NY. They are a paper tiger a travesty we need to kick out of this country now and stop any and all payments to them

2007-03-18 18:02:12 · answer #5 · answered by Kye H 4 · 1 1

The UN is totally impotent. The best thing for the UN would be to disband it.

2007-03-18 18:09:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Might help.

2007-03-18 17:51:48 · answer #7 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers