HE WILL BE GIVEN THE MEDAL OF FREEDOM AND WILL RETIRE TO SPEND MORE TIME WITH HIS FAMILY........IN DUBAI
2007-03-18 17:34:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6
·
6⤊
2⤋
Oh, there's a fall guy for every occasion.
But what difference would it make? Bush can appoint anyone he wants to take his place, for what's left of his time in office.
People need to wake up. NOTHING they do is going to change the fact that Bush is going to run the country for another 21 months. Period.
2007-03-19 00:36:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Democratic party is polluted by the Bushevik mindset. One need look only to Zell Miller to see the extreme example of Democratic Bushevism. Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut is a milder example. The Democrats remain unaccountable for their lack of opposition. Marie Cocco writing her January 11, 2005, Newsday column entitled, "Democrats' Fury, and Values, Go Awol", states,
Enabling the Bush administration's habit of escaping accountability for even the grossest failure isn't smart politics. It's cowardice. If Democrats are to compete on the political turf of values, they'd better find some they stand for.
Democratic Party values are Bushevist values, the values of the ruling elite. As James Wolcott in an article entitled, "Groundhog surfaces for sunlight" on his website http://jameswolcott.com (archives 03/2205) puts it,
The elites in this country have never had it so good, and as long as they're prospering the distress will be smothered under the surface, kept under a lid.
2007-03-19 00:35:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by dstr 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
I don't think so. Considering "Al" spent most of his time as AG acting as Bush's personal defender and less as a true Attorney General, I doubt Bush will get rid of him.
2007-03-19 00:43:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by james B 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
HEY GUYS I AM A BIG DUMB REPUBLICAN! AND I SAY THAT ITS BECAUSE OF BILL CLINTON'S FOREIGN POLICY DURRRRR!
/sarcasm off
That is the reply I am waiting to hear now. Yes, this guy is toast. Not only is he going to be questioned about the lawyers, but he is also going to be questioned and possibly subpoenaed with regards to the warrantless wire-tapping. Big shot above the law Bush blocked the investigation by the OPR regarding those wire-taps. Obstruction of justice anyone?
2007-03-19 00:38:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
I don't know, Bush has given him the ol' " I have every confidence in Gonzo," that is usually the kiss of death from the god father of Pennsylvania ave.
2007-03-19 00:43:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, if he did something wrong, then yes, he should resign. But we all forget Bill Clinton fired 93 of them in his first term of office. That is whats bad about an appointed position, its not permanent and you can be let go at any time for any reason.
So, the rain on people parade, no crime no foul and drive on. Next President will clean house when he gets into office so, that's the way it goes.
2007-03-19 00:34:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigmikejones 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
He will probably end up resigning so the senate doesn't subpoena Rove and have him testify under oath.
2007-03-19 00:36:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by mrlebowski99 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Oh puleez,Clinton fired 93 federal prosecutors..,Gonzales got rid of how many 8 because they failed to do their jobs.Investigate and prosecute voter fraud claims..,oh thats why the libs are mad.,voter fraud of libs..,if the libs can investigate why can't the conservatives..,another example of liberal hypocrasy at its finest and more people are seeing this.
2007-03-19 00:42:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by jnwmom 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Don't count your ticking Gonzales' before they resign.
2007-03-19 00:47:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by zclifton2 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I do not know if he is toast, but I think Bush would fire him before the Democrats would. Bush want put up with it, and the Democrats are use to covering up.
2007-03-19 00:37:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by zack 4
·
1⤊
4⤋