For those who think the Tenth Amendment allows states to legislate abortion, please answer this?

Question

Does this mean states can also legislate what television shows you're allowed to watch? After all, the Constitution doesn't cover it, so the state must be able to tell you what you can and can't watch, right?

Alexandra: That is an idealistic, and completely legally incorrect, analysis.

lltrix: Before you make a further fool of yourself, please go read the 10th Amendment. It has nothing to do with privacy.

joey: Glad you're in favor of me being allowed to control your television-viewing habits. Good to know that you're willing to turn over every little decision in your life to the same American people who elected George W. Bush twice. The founders are spinning in their graves right now.

Answer 1

I think that the extreme anti-abortionists are perfect examples of why Abortion is a good idea. Basically the government should NOT be able to tell people what medical procedures they can and can't have. Freedom of choice by the individual is the very foundation of democracy.

Answer 2

States have the power to allow cable networks in or not. They can tax TVs if they want. They can outlaw TVs if they want. They can forbid satellite dished if they want. I know it is hard to believe but the Constitution means what is says. Although the airwaves belong to the Federal Government and that has been covered by interstate commerce the states have a lot of power if they have the political clout to do it.

In some states the age of consent is 14 in others it is 18. They can regulate what age you are allowed to have sex, at what age you are allowed to drink liquor. They can regulate when and how you can operate a motor vehicle.

Before Roe V Wade was made law illegally by the Supreme Court, some states allowed abortion, some states did not. Anti-abortion people would have to convince each state's legislature to outlaw abortion one at at time.

This is not one big fat government. It is a union of 50 different State Governments.


.

Answer 3

The states don't have to "legislate" television content because it is already done by the Federal Communications Commission, which until recently was headed by Colin Powell's son. The state probably could not do a better job of limiting free speech/ free press than the FCC already does. Most every program you watch has a 'G' rating. Until recently even violent shows got a 'G' rating as long as they didn't show anything resembling sex or too much skin. Now television is going to change again because the FCC is going to shut down shows that show 'tool torture' like 24.

Answer 4

certain, it extremely is actual. Roe-v-Wade replaced right into a incorrect perfect courtroom ruling, no count number what your opinion on abortion should be. they did no longer have the Constitutional proper to make it a federal situation. regrettably, the aggressive imposition of abortion rights typically united states with assistance from the perfect courtroom is fairly the muse reason behind our extreme nationwide branch and polarization today. The anger or perhaps hatred that this example led to has executed irreparable damage to the team spirit of our united states. If it were allowed to progression clearly, then suitable compromises ought to were made via the years on the state aspect that everybody ought to were quite pleased with for the most area. Kansas ought to were having abortion only for rape or life of the mummy, even as enormous apple ought to have had limitless abortion, and the completed fabrics of our society doesn't were torn aside. maximum Constitutional students agree that the alternative replaced right into a nasty one. The "proper of privateness" certain with assistance from the 4th change replaced into meant to guard adverse to unlawful search for and seizure in the living house. The affected individual-well being care service courting isn't secure with assistance from the 4th change in the different section except abortion. How does that make experience? as an party, you at the instantaneous are not allowed well being care service assisted suicide below the 4th change. even if, if R-v-W is a sturdy selection, you may also enable for this and for the different element your well being care service needs to do to you, such as having sex in the exam room.

Answer 5

In a sense, yes, If a program started up with something that would make people angry, say Nazi News, and wanted to go on air, the state could jump in a say no. It just depends on how much pressure law makers get from the people.

Answer 6

I don't need the Tenth Amendment or the Ten Commandments to tell me that abortion is wrong. All life is precious and nothing or no one in this world will ever change my mind.

Answer 7

Roe v. Wade legislates that the gov't cannot interfere in a personal medical procedure. So TV would fall in that same category.

Answer 8

Well, if you could get state legislatures to agree on it...after listening to their constituents, why not?

Doesn't "our" definition of pornography depend on the citizens' beliefs in any particular area of the country? So, if you had a whole state of people who thought the Simpsons should be banned, I suppose the lawmakers of that state could ban it.

Answer 9

How would right to privacy allow them to legislate the t.v shows I watch. quite the contrary.

Answer 10

Actually, our laws are intended to safeguard innocent life.

Which means that any law or ruling "legalizing" abortion is unconstitutional, and therefore null and void.