English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a 21 year old female college student. no prior convictions of any kind. She's been asked to appear at the police station and at court. does any one know what these will both intale? Will this affect her permanent reccord? and how could this affect her future career?
Thanks in advance.

2007-03-18 16:15:59 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

It's potentially devastating. Let's hope not. Ontario is usually pretty liberal.

2007-03-18 16:19:00 · answer #1 · answered by balderarrow 5 · 0 0

Adam S: "possible get charged, by way of fact the regulation nevertheless exists "on the books", and that's the only concern maximum police forces care approximately." Jct: definite, the Parker decision invalidated the possession offence and that they did no longer substitute the offender code so that they had to drop 4000 expenses in 2003 and cover up the one hundred,000 bogus convictions in view that 2001. In 2003, the Krieger decision invalidated the cultivation offence and that they did no longer substitute the offender Code to replica it the two. And as you're saying, the law enforcement officials say: it is nevertheless on the books. "What occurs to you in courtroom is fullyyt distinctive, with maximum circumstances of easy possession being thrown out, fantastically if the splendid workplace work is filed, yet that would not recommend the law enforcement officials won't arrest or harass you." Jct: 2 days in the past, on Feb 24, Gerard fake had his marijuana expenses withdrawn in Peterborough after submitting a POLCOA prohibition of expenses action. In Nov. Ken Surgent has his expenses withdrawn quite than the Crown face his upcoming polcoa action in Windsor. "it is not any longer formally decriminalised." Jct: truthfully, it is been struck down, they purely won't substitute the offender Code. "in accordance to the controlled drugs and components Act, hashish continues to be unlawful, and law enforcement officials can and do nevertheless arrest for easy possession at times." Jct: And while human beings record their POLCOA action arguing that Parliament purely Legislates and that by way of fact Courts purely Abrogate, while the regulations have been struck down by using the courts, it took Parliament to hold them decrease back. while the Ontario courtroom of appeal J.P. decision stated that they had introduced it decrease back, they erred.

2016-12-15 03:22:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If Convicted they WILL be on her records. Sounds like she prolly should worry about the lesson she'll learn from this because if she gets one conviction she'll have to admit it any time a officer asks. Even if she's just been pulled over and he asks.Hopefully her future career isn't affected but it could be.

2007-03-18 16:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It should be legal and she should be set free.

2007-03-18 16:26:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers