Hate the truth don't ya...In DC 10,000 showed up to hear Cindy disgrace herself and demean the loss of her son....Nation wide another 10,000 or so...that is what the LIBERAL news tried to pass off as a success.....even though they had said 500,000 would turn out and they were WAY SHORT.......they only gave a blurb on the fact that 30,000 ANTI-PROTEST-PROTESTERS Rallied against them a short way from them...Traitor Cindy got 2+ min on the evening news...the Gathering of Eagles got 15-30 seconds...
Guess the liberals Mommy's didn't want them catching a cold and to be out on Monday for school
No need to lie...the TRUTH KILLS LIB LIES
2007-03-18 16:37:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Here in San Francisco the crowds where less than 3000, hell the first night of the war had over 10000.
3000 in a city of 750,000 is a awful and is less 1%
In case you haven't noticed the protests are getting smaller and smaller .
2007-03-18 16:16:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Our media in L.A showed the rally here. My husband went to it. He was there for the whole day. And, he said most of the people stayed all day too. He said there were less than 8 pro-war demonstrators at the march. Where as there were 20,000+ pro peace demonstrators at the march. The 8 pro-war people got more time than the pro peace march. It only proves that the media is obviously pro corporate and very conservative and biased.
Personally, I'd like to know where all the people fighting for their rights as immigrants are when it comes to this war. I find that the majority of them are against this war but where are they when it comes to carrying out their civil rights to protest it? My god, they only care about getting theres but when it comes to bringing our troops home, where the h*ll are they?
2007-03-18 16:11:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
if what you assert is actual, then it form of feels that countless the purported information is quite risky. i don't believe of that makes the perception a lie even if, in simple terms unproved. because the opposite view hasn't been proved both, ought to it no longer be safer to err on the area of caution? We had a similar difficulty in Britain with Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis. formerly the scientists proved that feeding bovine tissue to cows replaced into causing the ailment, numerous in touch activities insisted there replaced into no link. do not listen a lot from them now!
2016-11-26 21:37:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The anti-war protests today are miniscule compared to the Vietnam era. Maybe,because there's no draft.
2007-03-18 16:04:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by bebe 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
Was someone protesting Global Warming this weekend??
Darn, I wish someone had told me! I am sure that Al Gore was there and I really want to get him to autograph my copy of "An Inconvenient Truth"!
2007-03-18 16:04:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I saw coverage on CNN, ABC, and Fox. I listened to stories about it on NPR. I read about it right here on Yahoo, What are you yapping about?
Less then 20,000 showed up, and less than 1000 were still on hand an hour later. Those are the facts, my ill-informed leftist friend.
2007-03-18 16:06:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rick N 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
I saw alot more people holding up signs for every other agenda but the war.
2007-03-18 16:06:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by tabs 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Is this the global warming swindle or the violent protest to show how peace loving you radical liberals are ? It's always something ..
2007-03-18 16:04:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Given the weather, it is suprising anybody showed up.
But the seed has been planted, and, whether some people like it or not, (read Fox News) this is the beginning of the end of this stupid war.
2007-03-18 16:13:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋