English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And how come the liberals are agreeing with her?

2007-03-18 15:41:02 · 22 answers · asked by RUSH MAKES OBAMA CRY !! A LOT !! 5 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Because she thinks that people are listing to this terrorist loving pig dyke and think what she says means something. Any time anyone takes the word of a terrorist over their own nation is beyond contempt. I didn't think it would be possible to have a lower opinion of that pig that I already did, but I do.

2007-03-18 15:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

there is no longer a single shred of evidence that any 'torture' in any appreciate replaced into employed in comparison charecter. Water boarding replaced into an prevalent area of protection stress interrogation coverage on the time it replaced into employed. it extremely is superb which you each and every person is so blinded by hatred for the president that even the orchestrator of 9-11 is considered in a extra valuable gentle than Mr Bush. What has replace into of the undemanding, honest-minded liberal? it sort of feels he has long gone the way of the dinosaur. this sort of shame.

2016-10-02 08:47:40 · answer #2 · answered by whitehead 3 · 0 0

Who cares what Rosie thinks??

I don't believe all of it because the man was tortured, because he's a big blow-hard, and because I don't think he's smart enough to have been that high on the terrorist totem pole!

As for O'Donnell....she can say what she wants, think what she wants, but it doesn't affect me at all. I think she's a big blow-hard, too!

2007-03-18 15:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 2 0

Rosie is an alien from a distant galaxy far far away, who was put secretly on the starship Enterprise after Captain Kirk and Scotty pissed off the natives. Her Five year mission, is to disrupt common sense and logic on this planet, to pave the way for an envasion force led by her alien signifigant other, Hilary Clinton.

2007-03-18 16:33:19 · answer #4 · answered by Paully S 4 · 1 2

Well Rosie thinks if she did not say it, it is a lie. Same reason Liberals agree with her. Also the fact that Rosie now thinks she will be getting more support of her lifestyle.
Clinton Pledges Alliance With Gays
Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton told the nation's leading gay rights group in an unpublicized speech that she wants a partnership with gays if elected President.

Clinton also said she opposes the "don't ask, don't tell" policy regarding gays in the military that was instituted during her husband's presidency.

"I am proud to stand by your side," Clinton said in a keynote speech Friday to the Human Rights Campaign. Neither Clinton's campaign nor her Senate office made any announcement that she would be making the Friday address.

Asked twice at a Monday campaign stop in Iowa why she did not publicize her speech to the group, Clinton said: "You'll have to ask my campaign."

In the speech, Clinton joked that she shares the same initials as the group, and pledged to maintain the same close working relationship that last year helped defeat the federal amendment that would have banned same-sex marriage. "I want you to know that this is exactly the kind of partnership we will have when I am President," Clinton told the group. "I want you to know that just as you always have an open door to my Senate office, you will always have an open door to the White House and together we can continue this journey."

Clinton's husband Bill Clinton was President when the Pentagon instituted the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, which says gays may serve in the military only if they keep their sexual orientation private. In 1999, as she prepared to run for the Senate from New York, Clinton publicly opposed her husband.

Previous to Bill Clinton's administration, gays were flatly forbidden from serving in the military.

Sen. Clinton said it would be safer for the nation if openly gay soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen could wear the uniform. "This policy doesn't just hurt gays and lesbians, it hurts all our troops and this to me is a matter of national security and we're going to fix it," Clinton said.

Her chief rivals for the Democratic nomination, John Edwards and Barack Obama, also favor repealing the policy.

She also criticized the Bush Administration for making political appeals based on gay rights issues, vowing that her presidency would mark "the end of leadership that has politicized the most personal and intimate issues." Campaign vice president David Smith said Clinton's comments were "very well received," though he added the group is not endorsing the candidate and does not anticipate making an endorsement "anytime soon."

Clinton spokesman Blake Zeff said Monday the candidate "affirmed her desire to have a strong partnership with the gay community as President," adding they were "delighted" the speech was available on the Internet.

Clinton aides said no announcement was made because the gay group's gathering is traditionally closed to the press. Video of the speech was posted on the group's Web site. Smith said such annual board meetings have always been closed to the press, but it was the first time he could remember that a speech at such a meeting had been made public afterward. "There's no contradiction," he said. "The event is always closed to the press and we wanted to make [the remarks] available for people to see."

"Today we know that we have to move away from our dependence on foreign oil. Everyone says that," she said. "Our problem is figuring out how we would actually do it" since we do need the oil from anywhere we can get it.

2007-03-18 15:50:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

6 Months ago Rosie was having a very public war with Trump .Now she want to jump into politics .
Personally I don't pay her any mind , she a fat opinionated troll who cant stand to go a day without her name in the news .
She is the ultimate narcissist.


BTW Most thinking Liberal & Conservative agree there are better places to your news, than Rosie .

2007-03-18 15:58:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I'm not a liberal, and I've got my own doubts about it. How long has the man been locked up and questioned? He's just now giving details? How many recipients of torture have to tell us, and how many times has it been proven, that torture gets you nothing but what the tortured thinks you need to hear so you'll stop torturing him? Maybe he's had a conversion to Christianity and now loves his American captors so much he just can't help but tell them the truth. I don't know why anybody puts so much stock in what any terrorist says. They have no moral base to stop them from lying, at least to us.

2007-03-18 15:47:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Not many people believe this screwball and his confessions....the only things he hasn't confessed to are the death of JFK and the crucifixtion.

I guess after the U.S. has tortured you for months on end, you would confess to anything.

I don't believe it either - nor would I believe anything that comes from the mouth of an administration official - president or anyone. They are all liars.

2007-03-18 17:00:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

yeah sure i believe all of them - no need to wonder if he just said whatever it would take to stop the torture.

i heard he also confessed to the following crimes.
shot jfk
shot rfk
is the guy who really shot reagan
shot abraham lincoln
shot the sheriff
accepted responsibility for starting the american civil war
says he farts really badly and may be contributing to global warming.

anyone want to get in on this - got any unsolved murders or crimes that you need to pin on someone - this is the chance of a lifetime...

2007-03-18 15:50:25 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2 2

Possibly because "evidence gained under duress" isn't admissible in court. Left Wing Liberals seem to think those confessions were beaten out of him, and he (possibly) only said them to stop the torture. I don't know that happened, however.

2007-03-18 15:48:42 · answer #10 · answered by kj 7 · 0 2

Why wasn't every TV station interrupted with this news?
Why wasn't this the headlines of every newspaper on the
planet?
Why did he also confess to about 21 other crimes?
It's just too vague. I'm in complete agreement with
Elway_the_Cat & Nostradamus 02012.

2007-03-18 15:47:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers