Absolutely not. Whenever you have children, all the genes you have get completely suffled around each time. Just because the parents have the same DNA doesn't mean teh children will all have the same DNA. It's like saying every children from one set of parents will all be the same. Like siblings would all be the same. Because after all, they're still children that come from the same genetically identical parents.
2007-03-18 14:24:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by kz 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, just because they look the same, doesn't mean that the kid will look the same. The twins would have genes from their parents too that just didn't show up in them. Also, just because they're identical to their siblings, doesn't mean they look alike. (Unless they're from the same family and are identical, but then, still, their parents and grandparents genes are still in their parents, and because they're family, the interbreeding could cause many disorders)
2007-03-18 14:33:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by nejihyuuga_gal 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
they would all have characteristics of the parents and since both moms are identical and both fathers are identical, as an outsider, you wouldn't really be able to which kids belong to which parents, but they wouldn't all be little copies either.
similarily, my brother and i look very much alike and our kids could pass as siblings even though they have different parents. it would be even more likly that the children of two sets of identical twins would bear a greater likness to one another, than regular cousins
2007-03-18 15:27:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bio-student Again(aka nursegirl) 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it is relatively impossible for both of the twin girls to pass on the the same 23 chromosomes and even more impossible for the two male twins to pass on the same 23 chromosomes.
2007-03-18 16:29:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Daisy S. 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
confident, they might look like twins. My husband is an comparable twin, and our youngest and his brother's son look alot alike. We positioned them in photos mutually and persons stored asking which replaced into which. stupid people, you're those spelling babby incorrect.
2016-10-02 08:41:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by logston 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, this doesn't neccessarily have to be true. Certain genes could be passed on to the baby from one of the married couples. So, even if the babies did look alike, it's possible that one could have his/her dad's nose, etc.. Do you understand what I am trying to say?
2007-03-18 14:29:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not exactly the same, but many of them would look a lot alike. More than if their parents weren's so closely related.
2007-03-18 14:51:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joan H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
gee wizz thats a really interesting question hey,
you would think so?!!
2007-03-18 14:24:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by www.girl2mum.com 3
·
0⤊
1⤋