If Bush had it to do over again, do you think he would have not invaded Iraq without more World support?

Question

Would he ever admit that leaving a dictatorship in place was better than all-out cival, bloodshed and indeterminate cost in lives and money?

Answer 1

The saddest thing about Iraq is that no matter what a mess it is over there, how many people die, how many people lose limbs, everything that has happened in five years............THIS MAN STILL BELIEVES HE IS RIGHT

not only would he do it again.....he is still doing it, he tells the news that it takes time, that he is planting the seeds of democracy in the middle east.

The Bush family and Cheney family has not one family member enlisted in the army.....they dont know what the cost of war is.

Answer 2

I think Bush had his mind made up to invade Iraq even before he became President. His first order of business has always been to get "something" on Iraq.

As far as iiigood goes he is purely an ignorant man. People who can think with their minds don't follow their balls a day.

As for leaving a dictatorship and arming them has always been foreign US policy. As long as the US can get from them what they want they will prop them up in power for as long as it takes and "to hell with the people" of the nation.

Iraq, Chili, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Philippines, Argentina, and so on.

US, China, France, Australia. Protecting the deadliest regime ever in Cambodia. These countries should be taken in front of a world court for crimes against people.

Bamafann -- it's people like you that should never go off your meds.

The Americans are always crying that the UN doesn't work. That's very true because of the veto. But I am sure this is not what "the self proclaimed world police" means.

The reality is that all the forces in Iraq and Afganastan are there illegally and, subsequently are guilty of war crimes. There is no need to tell me that either of these wars is an attack on terror. al Quaida is NOT a country. It is a terrorist group without borders. It's birth place is Suadi Arabia. Why didn't we invade them?

Saddam wasn't a good man but Bush has been worse for Iraq than Saddam ever was. The Taliban in Afganastan are, from many points of view, a bad ruling class. But the world experience with the US is that a worse dictator is put in power. Let's take the veto out of the UN (its very unfair anyway) an work to make the UN a World Authority rather than a majestic masthead it has become with the veto held by certain coutries.

Answer 3

He may feel that way behind the scenes, but one will never hear him admit to such a thing publicly. The man simply has too great an ego to be able to admit that he even might have done anything wrong.

Answer 4

George W. Bush isn't smart enough to make a decision to tie his own shoes. The wealthy elitists behind the scenes, who really control this nation, ordered Bush to invade Iraq. They gave him the perfect excuse when they blew up the World Trade Center buildings on 9-11-01.
Immediately after that attack, when all other airplanes were grounded, prominent Saudi familes in town for a Carlyle Group investors' meeting, were flown out of the country on government jets. George H.W. Bush joined the Carlyle Group shortly after leaving the Presidency; the Carlyle Group became one of our country's primary government contractors right after the 9-11 incident. One Saudi family invested $2.5 million in the Carlyle Group; that family's name was binLaden.
There are only three reasons George W. Bush was told to unconstitutionally and illegally invade Iraq, a sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the U.S.A.:
1) The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein ever since the days of Desert Storm, when George H.W. Bush was criticized, ridiculed and humiliated for not ousting Hussein at that time;
2) Dick Cheney and his Exxon-Mobil buddies wanted all that cheap, easily-accessible foreign OIL so that they could get richer and richer and richer feeding America's dependency on OIL;
3) The giant U.S. military-industrial complex neeed a new 'war' to boost its sagging profits. Ever since industrialists realized how profitable war could be during World War II, they bought up all the politicians, hired pricey lobbyists, and formed special interest groups to encourage and promote more 'war'. Thus, the U.S. got involved in the Korean Conflict; the Cuban Missile Crisis; the Cold War; Vietnam; and Desert Storm, all for the sake of PROFIT - at any cost, even the cost of thousands of human lives.
Of the five worst mass murderers in the past seventy-five years, only one was brought to justice:
1) Joseph Stalin slaughtered 10 million of his countrymen and died peacefully in his sleep;
2) Adolph Hitler gassed 6 million Jews (and others he deemed 'undesirable') and committed suicide before he could be brought to justice;
3) Idi Amin killed 2 million people in Uganda and retired luxuriously in exile;
4) Saddam Hussein massacred over a million Iraqis, and was brought to justice when the Bush family arranged for his strangulation;
5) George W. Bush has yet to be held accountable for the deaths of 675,000 Iraqis; 3,000 innocent people who happened to be in the Twin Towers when they were bombed; and 3,200 U.S. soldiers (to date).
If Bush had it to do all over again, he'd do nothing different. In fact, watch closely:
by late spring, 2007, George W. Bush will come with a plausible excuse to invade Iran - an excuse that his ditto heads will support ("weapons of mass destruction" won't work a second time). He's been ordered by the wealthy elitists/industrialists/corporate greedheads to attack Iran for the very same reason they told him to attack Iraq: OIL - lots of cheap, easily-accessible OIL. Don't believe me?
Print this out and put it in your safety deposit box for the next few months. -RKO-

Answer 5

He would probably never admit that he would do it differently, however, he is human and would like to leave a good legacy. Therefore, I feel, in his heart of hearts, he would never invade Iraq if he were given a second chance. Unfortunately, there is no second chance and so there goes that good legacy.

Answer 6

He would do it again maybe even faster the next time, his only orders come from his nwo directors it wouldnt have made a difference who was supporting him

Answer 7

Yes, he seems to be very decisive. Thats the way a leader should be. Do what you think is right and don't stop to think about what the world might say or not say. If he was to spend time worring about hurting someones feeling then it would show weakness on his part. It's such feeling that has lead leadering to failure. Look at Mexico for example. Many people trying to cross into the U.S. because their leader cannot grow some balls.

Answer 8

No, sodam crazy was working with al queda, he was very outspoken about taking on the west.

Answer 9

To be honest with you, I wish he would do things different. Like sneak about 10 hydrogen bombs near the Iraqi border and fire them all at Bagdad and claim we didn't do it and knew nothing of it.

Answer 10

I honestly dont think he would invade but he still would find a way to avenge his dad