Will LIEberal policies cause the US to lose the war on terror?

Question

A loss for the US is a win for LIEberals; there is no denying that.

Answer 1

The Taliberals cause our troops to die everyday in Iraq by implementing "policies" that do not allow our Troops to finish the job. Taliberals do this simply to spite the President. Also, they tie our hands here at home too. We know who our enemy is, what they look like and what they want to do, yet we have to be careful not to infringe upon their rights! Have you ever seen "Mars Attacks!"? That is a perfect example of a taliberal mentality!

Answer 2

Excuse me, but the Democrats have only really had a voice in what goes on since January. Are you saying we were "winning" until then? Are you saying we are losing now? What are you saying exactly?

This is a global war on terror. The U.S. isn't the only participant nor the only victim. Many countries are involved and this will be going on for many, many years. Sit back and look at the whole picture or get off your soap box.

Answer 3

George Bush said that a war on Terror cannot be won. That was in a moment of sincerity and he was immediately advised by the political advisers to retract his statement.

Liberals can't stop America from winning anymore than anyone else could possibly win. How on Earth could a War on Terror be won? It doesn't make any sense.

Answer 4

Of Course it is....
What game do you play where you tell the opp that if we don't win by this time we will walk away and you will be free to do what you want...
That's what the LIEberals...NOT A MISSPELLING....are doing...their CUT and RUN agenda..is just being slowed down...it should be..when we accomplishh..this..we do this...when we accomplis that we do this.....NOT what the libs propose..if we haven't done this by then we pull out....

Even my 12 yr old son knows that all the TERRORISTS have to do is lay low till the Dems time line is past....

Every Lib that supports this should avoid that show ..Are you smarter than a 5th grades........they aren't

Answer 5

Given that the Bush Administration's "War on Terror" has:

* stretched the military close to the breaking point

* threatens to sink Iraq and the countries neighboring it into a regional war of Muslim factions

* legitimized and spread al Qaeda's anti-Americanism

* ruined the U.S.'s legitimacy, moral credibility and leadership position in the world,

* CREATED MORE TERRORISTS

If you call that "winning a war", it makes me wonder what you think losing is.

You might look up the phrase "Pyrrhic Victory". I've included a link below.

Answer 6

More like a win of the war is a loss for the US. If we supposedly "win" this war, think of how many other countries we would have to deal with. Other countries already hate us for trying to put our power on them.

Answer 7

We've lost lives in this war, with the under-sufficient amt of troops. Considering the # of that enemy and their weaponry will 20,000 fix it? Lose the war on terror-Homeland Security? Try going to: The Muslim Brotherhood-The Project, we better save some troops for here.

Answer 8

sure and no. The conflict in Iraq is diverting our concentration from the gritty artwork of engagement with the international community that could want to undermine anti-Western terrorism, if we did it correct. yet inspite of this, there is not any "conflict on terror" in a defense force experience - that's like retaining a conflict on foul balls. the most objective should be on WHO, no longer WHAT, is the enemy.

Answer 9

We cannot declare a war on something that has been around and will continue to be around. The best we can do is go after those who attacked us. We failed at that when we did not to go after Bin Laden, but instead invaded Iraq. There is no possible way that we can cause the US to lose. We already did.

Answer 10

The war against terror is created by the US government for certain purposes. Creating a war is a big game played by US and some Islamic governments, it is not related to liberalism.