Should the FDA prohibit people believing to have been injured by approved drugs not from suing drug companies?

Question

Last month, the FDA revealed its latest protective policy for drug companies in a statement that said people who believe they have been injured by drugs approved by the FDA should not be allowed to sue drug companies in state courts.

http://www.news-medical.net/?id=16291

Answer 1

I believe that the drug companies need to be held accountable for any side effects that they did not disclose. If the doctor is aware of the side effect then i see no reason for the drug company to be liable for the result. Our reliance on drugs to solve every problem needs to be strongly evaluated. Why does the FDA block information on nutritional alternatives to drugs?

Answer 2

final analysis, you could no longer generalize all docs or drug companies. sure, some docs will prescribe drugs that they are heavily marketed to, yet i do no longer think of it incredibly is the norm. My fiancee is a physician (OB/GYN) and she or he prescribes drugs, start administration, etc. based on the particular desires of her sufferers. i comprehend a honest type of docs, and that all of them save on with prudent rules while prescribing. of course, no longer all docs act that way and are in truth the drug companies lackeys. i think it incredibly is genuine of any marketplace, although. permit's no longer ignore that for the time of usa, well-being-care is a commodity. ought to the FDA be doing a greater advantageous interest? certainly! Is it their "fault", no longer unavoidably. on a similar time as i'm very saddened by ability of our well-being-care equipment, the U. S. nevertheless gives you the final determination of docs and medicines interior the international. like a number of different corporation, i think that the buyer, e.g. affected person, needs to tell themselves and analyze any Rx's that a physician needs to furnish them. Too many people tacitly settle for what their physician's say as actuality instead of sorting out themselves. So, there is blame to pass around the table. docs often is the perpetrator now and returned, drug companies would be, yet people are additionally complacent. it incredibly is yet yet one greater reason we prefer sweeping reforms interior the entire well-being-care equipment interior the U. S..

Answer 3

If a drug company falsifies data or withholds adverse outcomes, they should be held liable.

Conversely, expert witnesses must be held to the highest standards. No "junk science!"

Whether suits are in federal or state courts, that's beyond my expertise.

Answer 4

Oh My Gosh! They should never be allowed to do this if they put out a drug that injurs someone its thier fault for not testing it properly!

Answer 5

i agreeeee.
no they shouldn't be allowed to sue, since it was there own choice of taking that drug & shouldn't blame the companies.