Approximate numbers are ...
War Protesters...10-15 thousand
Pro-US /Anti-Protesters Rally...30 thousand.plus..
PROOF...the libs do not have teh support thay claim
2007-03-18 11:05:08 · 12 answers · asked by Try Reality 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
SO WHAT if the libs won last Nov....you like polls
COngress approval is at 28%...LOWER THAN THAT OF GW...lololol
2007-03-18 11:28:23 · update #1
The sources are the Yanoo news...times...La times...
They are BRAGGING of HUNDREDS
not even reaching a thousand..."they hoped for 100,000 they got between 1 and 2 thousand
Google...a gathering of eagles for the anti \rally...numbers
2007-03-18 11:34:33 · update #2
No, they will not. Nancy and her alter IDs spammed Y/A over and over with info on this protest that fizzled. We should thank that Troll for the failure of this protest. The Troll turned people against the cause it was trying to promote. lol
2007-03-18 11:10:48 · answer #1 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋
you're making a lot of assumptions including your statements. The Washington submit suggested the protests were frequently non violent. There are always malcontents who get over excited and reason complications, yet they were suggested to be at a minimum. also, why do you assume that each easily one of the human beings who became a difficulty were the anti-conflict protesters? there have been also human beings there loudly status adverse to the anti-conflict protesters. You, or I, do not have any way of understanding how a lot of each team provided complications. yet after reading your additonal information and seeing your penchant for stereotyping by ability of calling all anti-conflict protesters "pot smoking non operating birkenstock donning hippies," there is not any favor to respond to the question. Hippies? Birkenstock donning lol? Are you stuck in the previous? easily, that's exceedingly humorous. attempt to settle for the actual undeniable actuality that 70% of this united states does no longer approve of this conflict. until eventually 70% of this united states one way or the different magically became into pot smoking non operating hippies, there's a lot of not straightforward operating sober lifelike human beings like myself that fill that share. I do have an old pair of Birkenstocks inspite of the actuality that, they're very tender ;).
2016-12-02 04:47:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The statistics you quote are quite different from what I've read but I'm glad to see that people are finally stand up and speaking for what they believe. If the libs don't have the support they need, what happened last November on election day?
Step off your high horse and just wait. The MAJORITY of citizens in the wonderful country are fed up with the rhetoric the administration has been shoving down our throat. Most US citizens are intelligent enough to know when they're being lied to. Hence the reason mr. bush's ratings are the lowest ever.
And by the way, read some of your answers. There's a lot of bitterness directed toward those of us who can think for ourselves.
2007-03-18 11:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by katydid 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
While I doubt those numbers, there is no question but that the "Massive Protest" was anything but massive. I also thought the folks that they got to speak was quite telling...Cynthia McKinney, Cindy Sheehan and Ramsey Clark.
Talk about the three stooges!
Where were John Murtha, Dennis Kucinich, John Kerry, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi?
Doesn't their absence speak volumes?
2007-03-18 11:39:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It saddens me, but it doesn't surprise me. There are more stupid people than smart people in this country beyond any doubt. By the way this is not saying that I believe your numbers, the government likes to stack these things. In the 70s I saw hundreds of thousands and the news said tens of thousands, so maybe there is hope after all.
2007-03-18 11:16:53 · answer #5 · answered by irongrama 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It's not about success or failure. It's about people speaking their conscience which is protected in our society.
Most likely they are the minority just trying to sway public opinion. The success is that they are able to protest at all.
As far as support, let's see what happens in the next election.
2007-03-18 11:11:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
When you admit that support for the war among THE ENTIRE US POPULATION has dropped to the bottom of the barrel, then we'll talk.
2007-03-18 11:17:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
The aim was to protest, not to have more people than the other team. That's just petty. So no, it wasn't a massive failure.
2007-03-18 11:07:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
while people are protesting on both sides..... U.S. Soldiers are dying in Iraq in a futile and unjust war for what??????
liberation???? they need to take ownership of their own democracy
evil dictator??? he's dead!!!
WMD's???? eeeeeeerrrrrrrr
fight terrorism???? we are creating more terrorists in Iraq than Osama could have ever dreamed of!!!!!!!!
so again..... who gives a shite about the protest!!!!!
2007-03-18 11:10:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
If your numbers are true (and I hope they are), then rock on!
2007-03-18 11:13:56 · answer #10 · answered by irish_giant 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋