Do you think O.J. SImpson is a murderer?

Question

The case is well known and most agree that he did in fact kill his estranged wife and Ron Goldman and was set free by an ignorant and biased jury. What are your thoughts on the case?

Answer 1

I think the reason he got off was because they had 8 black women on the jury that did not want to convict a balck man.
He is guilty and he got away with it.

Answer 2

time machine question?!?!

Yes. Guilty as hell. I don't have the room to go into it. But, without any shred of evidence pointing to ANYONE else, even a unknown person, and evidence putting OJ on the scene...hummm.

He got off because of 1. He is a rich LA Insider. 2. Ito was an idiot. I cant imagine how he got out of law school. 3. Prosecution did a haphazard job...they should have been dis-bared. 4. Racially biased jury. 5. The trial was a circus act to be sure. If the jury acquited, it made a better story and book deal times 12.


Yeah. He did it.

Answer 3

Being a paralegal, I know that having all of the facts is the only way to make an informed decision. We, as lay people on the outside, are relying on incomplete information provided to us by the media. Emotions and personal feelings have no place in legal proceedings. They must be tried on the facts alone. I may feel one way, i.e, that he did do it, but I cannot let that influence what the facts say. And I cannot "guess," based on incomplete facts. Thus, without being in the courtroom every single day of the trial so as to have all of the facts, none of us outside of a courtroom are capable of making this sort of decision.

Answer 4

I made an effort out of principle NOT to follow the details of his case which made your country a LAUGHING stock in the rest of the world.

Based on what I have heard such as the testimoney of an FBI profiler in his book on serial killers, I believe it is HIGHLY likely that he IS guilty.

However, one has to PROVE that in court which relies both on jurors who CARE and also somewhat on INTEGRITY of ones police force.

I suspect in that case, the problem was more with the former than the later but certainly I've heard the implication that evidence was planted but not heard the details about the probability of that. In a high profile celebrity case like that, I'd be shocked if even a corrupt police officer would do that but the thought that any police officer would ever try that is disturbing.

Answer 5

Yes he is but his estranged wife and Ron Goldman were NOT the Saints that people made them out to be. They were not perfect in fact I think they provoked O.J.

Answer 6

Playing the race card really works and especially in Hollyweird.
He got off because of a dumb white cop and the need of our people to be PC. Yes the cop was an *** and very likely raciest but that doesn't excuse the murder committed by OJ.

Answer 7

There is no doubt in my mind that OJ is a murderer. I don't know what the Jury was listening to but they sure came up with the wrong decision.

Answer 8

I believe that he did kill his ex wife and Ron Goldman.

Answer 9

Of course he did, and the stupid political court system let him get away with it since he had BIG BUCKS! The judge was just as ignorant as the jury. Its a shame how our justice system is run in the USA.

Answer 10

I cannot comment on his innocence or guilt - I was not a witness to the murders.

Forensic evidence was tainted, the glove did not fit, the prosecution was inept. They left the door open enough to allow the defence to establish reasonable doubt.