What would be your thoughts on a returning Nation, possibly as an inter-brand stable/faction?
RAW: Viscera (orig. Member)
Shelton Benjamin (feud with Haas)
Cryme Tyme (good push)
SMACKDOWN!: Mark Henry (orig. Member)
Booker T (no stupid King gimmick)
MVP
ECW: Marcus Cor Von & Elijah Burke (tag-team or singles)
Bobby Lashley (turning heel)
I know it'll be boring maybe at first and it splits up a perfectly great tag-team (WGTT) but think of the after-math when it splits up!! ECW vs RAW vs SMACKDOWN! [Battle royale of them monsters!]
Plus Ron Simmons may be given a good management role, after he was cheaply "fired" after his long tedious run with WWF/E and gets good on-screen time. [2 tag-teams can benefit and improve the division, maybe a third in Henry/Booker/MVP] Benjamin/Lashley/Booker/Henry could be top-title contenders with MVP & Viscera being mid-card going for mid-titles. Is it over-worked?
2007-03-18 10:01:23 · 5 answers · asked by Eternal Carnage 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
There really is no reason for a Nation of Domination now. Back then, those guys teamed up because they felt they were not being used to their full potential. All guys suggested already have quite a presence on whatever show they're on.
Besides, the original NoD was around when we only had one show. I doubt one show could have such a large faction, and such a large faction would require an equally large faction to rival with them. The divisions of the WWE, and the lack of motivation are drawbacks. I doubt there will be another NoD.
2007-03-18 11:11:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm thinking no. Its not really IMHO a good idea to create a stable of all African Americans just to give them a cheap push.
2007-03-18 10:18:23 · answer #2 · answered by no more heroes 2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nah its good i give it a 8/10
2007-03-18 10:05:13 · answer #3 · answered by ♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO its good
2007-03-18 10:04:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can there be any whites
2007-03-18 10:11:14 · answer #5 · answered by timothy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋