It showed for a time that Sparta and the Peloponnesian League were the best city-states in Greece. The reason Sparta went to war with Athens was because of the "Athenian Empire" they had. So it showed that one city-state wasn't going to have that much power, land, resources.
2007-03-22 01:09:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by josh m 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
3: Consequences
In Athens, the democratic system survived. Even without the income generated by the empire, democracy proved to be a well-functioning political system.
This can partly be explained from the fact that during the war, the economy of Athens changed. Once, most Athenians had been peasants; after the outbreak of the Decelean War, trade and commerce became increasingly important. These activities were almost as profitable as the old empire.
Thebes increased in strength and became a major power. Sparta, on the other hand, only temporarily benefited from its victory. Its social structure was unsuited for a world larger than the Peloponnese. In the fifth century, Greece had been a bipolar political system, but changed into a multipolar system.
The great victor was, of course, Persia. Not only did it regain the Greek towns in Asia, but it was to have great diplomatic influence among the "Yaunâ".
Many people had been exiled and had become mercenaries to make a living. Others had become professional soldiers because they could no longer return to their farms. Warfare became a specialism.
2007-03-18 10:27:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well it showed that the sea power and bulling of Athens with its so called allies was not strong enough. Its laws on citizenship meant that it was left alone when its population was decreasing. then just at a time when a less offensive campaign was needed they decided to take on a mission to help a group in Sicily. this lead to a huge disaster that they never recovered from. While the Persian wars showed that a strong Greece was able to withstand a super power alone they would fall fast. the first war was bad enough but the second war was a total disaster for both sparta and Athens. within a few decades the new greek power would be macedonia and alexander the great.
2007-03-18 11:09:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by BUST TO UTOPIA 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, it was the beginning of the end. "United we stand, divided we fall" is the lesson we can learn from that.
During the Persian War, the Greek city-states had some semblance of unity. Once Athens hijacked the Delian League and turned it into its own "rebuild Athens" fund, the other city-states turned on it.
No one ever truly recovered from the war, least of all Athens. All that was left was for everyone to sit back and wait for Macedonia to take over the area. The great experiment in confederacy was over, and it was time for the age of empires.
2007-03-18 10:00:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Monc 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
don't be attentive to web pages yet how's this for one assessment. Romans gave us the senate. the individuals, a frontrunner in western way of life, or flagship in case you desire to call it that, have a senate and senators etc. They borrowed promptly from that concept. As a private opinion usa sought to bypass away in the back of each and every thing ecu that did no longer look advantageous and alter into amassed from the dark a protracted time, a era ridden with the help of superstition. no longer that British parliamentary device did no longer conceive sturdy strategies for the time it replace into presented around the 1600s or a splash in the previous i think of merely after the dark a protracted time (undergo in strategies the dark/center a protracted time lasted 500 CE to 1500 CE greater or less) besides the fact that if it probably created a hierarchical device with glaring defects to floor in later years. The individuals never theory approximately having a chief minister yet went forward with what regarded a foolhardy theory on the time.. to have a president. I undergo in strategies examining that somebody lower back then laughed on the advice of Ben Franklin of appointing a president, asserting Presidents are for cricket golf equipment and to no longer run international locations. In end, this u . s . that had to do something appreciably distinctive, American, borrowed promptly from the belief of the roman senate the place a team of persons talk concerns informally or semi formally and arrive on the main suitable answer. As for Hellinistic civilization, am afraid i've got not got a great answer different than that the greeks have been conquerors. might desire to the comparable strategies-set be suggested to be western, as portrayed with the help of American's desire to triumph over besides the fact that if peacefully in the favourite age? theory those titbits might upload some spice in case you're lacking strategies.
2016-10-19 00:29:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it determined that the kingdom of Sparta would enjoy supreme political power in the Greek peninnsula, and that Athens would suffer a decline.
2007-03-18 09:53:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by steve_geo1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋