A shark is a carnivore right?Well so then all fish should be consider meat Why aren't they?Sharks do eat fish!

Question

So technically my friend would be wrong because Tunafish,Fish,every fish have to be considered meat because a shark is a carnivore! Am I right about this becuase everybody is saying that a tunafish can't be meat but they have to be because Sharks are carnivore!SO.......should fish be considered meat or not?Please help me with this question!Whoever does thank you so much your the best!!!!!!:-*

Answer 1

It is meat - meaning the flesh of an animal, but it is considered differently by religions, and some vegetarians.

Meat from fish is also much healthier than meat from other animals.

Hope that clears it up.

Answer 2

There are different ways to define meat. If the definition is muscle tissue, fish is meat. Some ancient definitions made the distinction between fish and mammals / foul on several bases. Fishing was a different occupation than farming. Mammals and foul were used in ritual sacrifices. Fish was a daily food; mammals and foul were season fare.

Answer 3

Fishes are meat for dietary purposes, yes. Vegetarians do not eat fish.
However for Church ritual purposes, fishes are not considered meat; on occasions when Church discipline says to "abstain from meat," fish is still permitted.
(Similarly some Jews do not consider birds as "meat" for ritual purposes.)

Answer 4

Yes you can eat fish, the Law states anything in the seas with scales is clean and acceptable to eat.

Answer 5

Yes fish is considered as meat.
Most vegeterians consider it as meat too.

Answer 6

Don't forget sharks are picky about the food they eat.