English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-18 09:25:48 · 13 answers · asked by sara c 2 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

13 answers

No he never molested any child, he would never do that!

♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥

2007-03-18 13:39:45 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 2 3

I, obviously do not personally know. No one does. My mother used to work with Macaulay Culkin's aunt Lolly. She said that Macaulay SWEARS up and down that Michael has never touched him (if any of you knew about the old rumors that were flying around about Michael and Culkin) and in his heart, he believes that the allegations are false.

But again, who really knows?

2007-03-18 10:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by Brandy G 3 · 2 0

No. Those people went to Michael Jackson and threaten him with going public with the rumors. When he refused to pay up, they went ahead and filed charges against him. Because he got tired of paying these people not to tell horrible lies on him. I would have done the same. I wouldn't dare let anyone make a fool of me. Sure MJ is weird. And feels more comfortable hanging around children. But is he a molester? No.

2007-03-18 10:53:59 · answer #3 · answered by LAhLAh 2 · 3 2

Everybody knows that he didn't do anything! People just took advantage of his love for children and the way he physically changed! Just leave the man alone! People already messed up his name,career, and his reputation with those filthy lies! A nice man does't have to be perfect! It's not like all of you are perfect! You are all just jealous that he has many qualities that none of you have including beauty,money,loyalty and feelings!You all seemed to have gotten everything you wanted from this event!( the destruction of his reputation) You all tried to make the King Of Pop fall,but he didn't! You all failed! He stood up to everyone there and confronted everything and everybody there and he survived! I think you all have figured out that the King Of Pop isn't easily defeated! He has power! The power of his fans who have stayed loyal to him no matter what the filthy press says! He has the power to bring us his message of PEACE and LOVE through his music! You aren't anyone to judge anybody! Nobody has the right to judge a man who they don't even know! He is an adult and I think we all know that he knows what he's doing! Give him that same respect that you would like to reiceve back! Everyone has the right to be respected, and that can only happen if you respect back! If you don't like him,fine! But please,there's no need to offend him and to make up dirty stories to destroy him! He is a human being and he deserves to be respected just like everyone else!Remember that!The King Of Pop is back and nobody or anything is going to stop him or get in his way! You all know why? Because he is Michael Jackson! The King Of Pop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...

2007-03-18 12:38:42 · answer #4 · answered by Manapazza 5 · 2 2

one day while i was watching Vh1 they had a special on Micheal Jackson. Since he was always on tour he didn't really have a childhood. So when he was an old man he made Neverland and made up his childhood. And when he was in Neverland he probrably realized he didn't really like girls, because he always saw his dad having sex with them when Micheal was a young boy. He might have, you never really know. But he isn't like the best father. Cmon, he put his child over the balcony. He is is crazy!

2007-03-18 09:55:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I think so. That man needs help. He didn't have much of a childhood and I think that he was trying to relive his childhood through these children.

2007-03-18 09:42:57 · answer #6 · answered by Kyla 4 · 2 2

No one really knows

2007-03-18 15:09:36 · answer #7 · answered by tRaCi3 4 · 0 0

I don't know if it's true are not but if I had kids I would not let MJ near them

2007-03-18 09:34:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

No he didn't.

NOT GUILTY! what does that mean? oh duh...not guilty.
And quit comparing it to OJ case everyone cause it's the only one where 'not guilty' was not true.

2007-03-18 11:54:32 · answer #9 · answered by Jennifer 5 · 2 2

i don't no????????????????? i have been thinking about that myself.they should investigate it more

2007-03-18 10:54:47 · answer #10 · answered by dianaw2305 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers