English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For those of you who believe that 19 Arabs led by another sick Arab on dialysis in a cave on the other side of the plant managed to:
1) Out wit our trillion dollar defense,
2) Cause NORAD to stand down
3) Defy the laws of physics by causing 3 buildings to collapse at freefall speed without the use of explosives
4) And then miraculously survive the plane crashes (at least 7 of the 19 are still alive),
PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF YOUR THOERY

2007-03-18 09:17:00 · 14 answers · asked by eatmeneocon 2 in Politics & Government Politics

If you can’t do that, then perhaps you could at the very least prove that Bin laden did it. But before your do, please note that the “confession” tape has been discredited as a FAKE:
The Swedish company Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence confirmed that Bin Laden’s video “admission” was a fake.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2526309.stm
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/29/1038386299712.html?oneclick=true
It doesn’t even look like Bin Laden. Bin Laden was suffering from terminal organ failure and was on dialysis. He was skinny sickly and pale. The guy in the video is fat healthy dark skinned and has completely different features.
http://italy.indymedia.org/uploads/2002/12/osama_fake_reals.jpg
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/osama_b_caught_on_tape.jpg
Bin Laden
http://www.apfn.net/MESSAGEBOARD/10-31-04/osamas_103004.jpg
Bin Faken
http://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/2001/binfakevb.jpg

2007-03-18 09:17:44 · update #1

14 answers

I truly appreciate this question, answered it before and i will answer it now. Please do take the time to read.

To all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks.

Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention.

The following is irrefutable:

Fact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him.

Fact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians.

Fact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7.

Fact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics.

Fact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.

Fact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times.

Fact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families.

Fact: No one has been fired for 9/11.

Fact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead?

Fact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

The bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted by them since they determined the conclusion prematurely.

If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or and FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down or messed up that day?

To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.

More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.

Go ahead and give this thumbs down if your patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.

So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your cheap patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a president and a government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for accountability, truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer.

Peace. And pray for the truth.
Source(s):
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7895306224389722116&q=9%2F11+first+responders
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6606909833563454569&q=9%2F11+first+responders
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
Credit to Rob in NY.

2007-03-18 09:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by gabriell_021 2 · 4 0

Who needs proof. Our government loves us and would never try to take away our freedoms.

NORAD didn't stand down they were doing the best they could with all those drills Cheney scheduled for that day.

Defy the laws of physics?? Steel buildings always fall down. I cant believe all that steel and concrete stood that long. Doesn't steel melt at like 200F anyway.

Those Hi-Jackers ain't still alive. Bin Laden probably cloned them or somthing. Only people like the BBC, AP, CNN, and MSNBC have reported stuff like that who believes those idiots any way. The FBI even reported about the uncertainty of the Idenity of the hi- jackers we all know how crazy those FBI guys are.

2007-03-18 16:35:24 · answer #2 · answered by captpcb216 2 · 1 1

Wow, amazing diatribe, great use of innuendo and baseless accusations. So, when did supposition become fact? Please, I'm sure your community offers many resources for your situation, just look in the Yellow Pages under Mental Health.

2007-03-18 16:31:40 · answer #3 · answered by Political Enigma 6 · 1 3

Here read this. Written by a liberal (one with an actual working brain).

"Enough of the 9/11 Conspiracies, Already"

http://progressive.org/mag_wx091106

2007-03-18 16:21:53 · answer #4 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 1 5

damn I'm sick of this crap lets see we have pictures of them getting on the jet from the security cameras we heard them on the radio after they hijack the jets then we saw them crash into buildings none of them are still alive and the reason they fell of free fall speed is because of gravity you might want to learn about it and NORAD didn't stand down

2007-03-18 16:28:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

At the very least we have it from the horses mouth that he's a freaking LIAR!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFl5NBzdt7c

2007-03-18 16:20:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No, they can't provide proof. All they can do is repeat the wrong-wing talking points(lies).

2007-03-18 16:20:49 · answer #7 · answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5 · 3 3

The public(sheep) must awake out of this NeoCon Nightmare...

2007-03-18 16:20:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Everyone has their own opinions on 9/11. And my opinion, I will not say in fright that I might change someone else's thoughts. And it's not my place to do that. So all I'm going to say is that you shouldn't believe everything someone else believes.

2007-03-18 16:20:34 · answer #9 · answered by Min 3 · 0 6

Maybe you should talk to Jennifer. She believes the same crap you do.

2007-03-18 17:46:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers