2007-03-18 08:13:32 · 17 answers · asked by Stealth 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no! and if you americans want to become a "normal" nation you must stop causing wars in the world.
2007-03-18 08:55:32 · answer #1 · answered by Rozel 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
President Bush asked for the call using stress to oust Saddam. A decision surpassed by ability of the two Democrats and Republicans. consistent with intel given to him by ability of the Clinton administration. So why did Clinton while confronted by ability of a real risk be certain to attack Serbia?
2016-10-01 03:12:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they rejected me once for a lame medical reason. if they would lighten up on their acceptance policies i would have already been there.
also, one of your other answers "Jennifer" either clearly doesn't know what she is writing about or is trying to mislead people on purpose. Despite what hippies say, wars do not need approval from the security council, however the iraq war did have a resolution authorizing war if saddam did not cooperate with UN weapons inspectors. There are also other ways war can be waged such as self-defense, and on humanitarian grounds. Since Saddam murdered millions of his own people and they were starving, this would also justify action. Also, self-defense doesn't mean that you have to wait to be attacked before waging war. There is something called "anticipatory" self-defense, which means that you can attack first in self-defense if you believe you are about to be attacked. It is sad when someone, like Jennifer, takes 1 class in international law from a hippie burn-out professor and thinks she knows everything. My God, are people like her our future????
2007-03-18 08:19:19 · answer #3 · answered by Matt 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He should be asking his daughters to go. That's who he should be asking. He's the one that got us into this mess. Why should I go clean up his failure, his lies and his bullsh*t? It's time that the GOP and Bush and Cheney take personal responsibility for this mess and clean it up. But they won't, they will blame everyone else including dems, liberals, Cindy Sheehan and MM for their mess. So no, I won't go clean up his sh*t in Iraq either. Besides, war is against my Christian beliefs.
BTW, all you people who say that they would go now if asked by the prez, why are you waiting to be asked? GO NOW if that is how you feel. Did you wait for your momma to ask you to clean up your room? Get to Iraq NOW!
BTW, Anthony, self defence does mean that you are attacked first. If you attack first, before being attacked yourself, you are on the offence.
2007-03-18 08:25:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
In a INSTANT!!!
Espeacially if i got to level out Afganastan too!!!
Gimmie the guns, the ammo and the tanks I will be a one man demolition crew~!
LET ME AT EM!
2007-03-18 08:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The US military shouldnt be there. I have a brother in the Marines & we worry sick about him getting killed by a roadside bomb or a helicopter crash everyday. Our soldiers arent dying in war, theyre dying just being there.
2007-03-18 08:34:30 · answer #6 · answered by plainfieldcletusblue 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If he asked me personally....then I would reenlist for a 2nd time.
Until then, the war in Iraq is a mess, nor is there a final victory plan.
2007-03-18 08:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If Iraq attacked us then yes otherwise no.
2007-03-18 08:29:08 · answer #8 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, because I am busy fighting with the idea that wars are ultimately a necessity.
2007-03-18 08:19:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
IM going to guess the courageous republicans are going to say YES, and the cowardly lions are going to say NO, its illegal, but really thinking, no, I might mess my hair up and get shot in the leg...
2007-03-18 08:17:55 · answer #10 · answered by Bl3ss3dw1thL1f3 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋