past history says yes
2007-03-18 12:18:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by nate 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not necessarily. If it was a hunting trip there might be some question based on a past incident than one might opine that Cheney had something to do with it. Otherwise no reason to necessarily suspect V.P. Cheney.
2007-03-18 15:15:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why should anyone assume Cheney hurt you ? If he was out with some friends, what does that have to do with you ?
2007-03-18 15:30:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No - I'd look at Henry Waxman first; if he had a believable alibi (doubtful, but possible), then I'd look at Chuck Schumer next.
You know ol' Chuck, right? The senator who's in favor of maximum gun control who carries a pistol himself at all times. You definitely want to keep ol' Chuck in mind if anyone is out there getting "severely hurt".
2007-03-18 15:15:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fast Eddie B 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
well, if it was a matter of odds, the money would be on the dark lourde of the USS Death Star, Darth Cheney.
2007-03-18 15:14:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Boy talk about old news.
Cheney was out hunting and hunting accidents to happen.
What are you going to do when Bush leaves with all that hate.
I think you need a better hobby.
2007-03-18 15:20:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Part of hunter safety is NOT walking up unannounced behind someone who is holding a shotgun.
2007-03-18 15:41:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Assume, innocent until proven guilty.
2007-03-18 15:14:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I would ASSume they got hurt protecting him from liberal wack jobs.
2007-03-18 15:28:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes.
That said, he would have a right to a fair trial, if he were charged.
2007-03-18 15:17:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by catrionn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋