Why wasn't Iran invaded in 2003 instead of Iraq?

Question

-Saddam would have invaded Iran with us because he hated Iranians even more than he hated Americans, and the Persian Gulf War was long over. He hadn't invaded since the Iran-Iraq War because nobod else would support him, and Iran was more powerful than him. but on our side, we would have been more powerful.
-Iran is building nuclear weapons that they say are peaceful, but that is obviously a lie.
-Iran was always more of a threat than Saddam was. Iran is close to getting WMD's and Iraq had none.
-Iranians are giving insurgents weapons to kill US troops, so they are indirectly killing our troops.
-Their President wants to wipe Israel off the map, most likely with nuclear weapons.

Saddam even wrote once, and this was after the Gulf War, that he despised Iranians more than anyone else.

Answer 1

i feel sorry for whom believe all the sh** news and others say
god has givven us brain to think and decide.how do you know if iranian are going to building nuclear weapons ?????
have ever heard a terror activity done by an iranian???????
israel has said directly it has nuc bombs isnt it a greater danger than a country that you GUESE it has bombs????

Answer 2

I'll tell you why Iran didn't have UN sanctions against them as Iraq did. They weren't lieing like Saddam did at everyturn. Saddam was breaking every sanction the UN put on them after Desert Storm.
Most of what you day here is nothing but propaganda. But what does every Arab nation want, the destruction of Israel it just isn't Iran that wants their destruction. They are in Arab land that was centuries ago. Israel are the trespassers, they are also the aggressors.
Iran was once building a Candu Nuclear reactor about 25 years ago (could have been Jordan) and the Israelis bombed it killing not only that nations people but also a few odd Canadians.
Yes they are building nuclear facilities but they don't say anything about WMDs and yes after they get there Atomic Facilities on line certainly they'll have the capability of WMDs. What are you taking the governments bull to come up with your so called crap your trying to spread, remember Bush put the wool over your eyes time and time again and your believing it again.

Answer 3

Because Iran did not repeatedly violate the ceasefire terms agreed to at the end of the first Gulf War.
Iran did not repeatedly fire on US aircraft.
The Executive Council of the UN did not vote unanimously to oust the leader of Iran.

Iran is a country run by people who wish us dead...but until recently their nuclear ambitions were kept in check.

I'm always amused when people ask why we didn't invade N.Korea, or Iran, Syria etc instead of Iraq.
Heres ther obvious reason...we were 100% justified in the ousting of Saddaam, and look at the grief this president gets for doing the RIGHT thing...imagine if he had gone in anywhere else with far less justification.

At the end of the day, there is NO action this president takes that will ever be seen as correct by the secular-progressives in the mainstream media and the diehard leftists that are blinded by hate.

Answer 4

nvading Iraq was the most logical step in overthrowing the Iranian government whilst losing the least American soldiers.
I believe one of the objectives was to put so much pressure on the Iranian extremist government that they will go bankrupt before they can actually get a nuclear weapon.
Their mostly pro-western peoples will be dissatisfied to say it mildly and overthrow the current extremist.
Let's face it the Sha was the worst as far as the Iranians felt and they have "settled" for an extremist government that has improved living standards for them. If standards drop with their economy teetering on the brink of bankruptsy do not be suprised if another pro-western government emerges with a military coup.

Afghanistan to their east and Iraq on the west. One point of the axis of evil is surrounded and under immense pressure to attain a nuclear power they cannot afford to gain in such a short period of time. Yet it is their only avenue to keep their extremist terrorist sponsoring government intact. Therefore they hope for the best with Achmidinahjhad's statements "We are full steam ahead with our nuclear proliferation." They realize attaining nuclear power is their only hope. That is why they will NOT budge whether discussions are unilateral or multi lateral. This will only buy them time. A commodity that they have very little of.

Answer 5

Iran is plenty larger than Iraq, with a much bigger inhabitants. For all its problems, i think of the Islamic Republic in all probability has plenty much less assailable public help than Saddam's dictatorship did. to boot, i ask your self what number US-made weapons the Iranians nevertheless very own, relationship from the days whilst the US replaced into arming the Shah - and, of direction, encouraging his nuclear capability application. i've got no conversations with suitable protection stress planners or US diplomats, yet my guess is they did no longer invade Iraq in 2003 because of the fact they theory it could be a harder nut to crack. For one ingredient, the Iranian inhabitants does not have the violent antagonisms between Shiites, Arab Sunnis and Kurdish Sunnis that existed in Iraq in 2003 and nevertheless exist immediately. surprisingly, many of the Neoconservatives who supported the 2003 Iraq conflict claimed to have self assurance that Iraq had the aptitude to alter right into a colourful Arab democracy, as quickly as Saddam's dictatorship replaced into ended. i do no longer think of they have made comparable claims approximately Iran, even in spite of the shown fact that i do no longer comprehend in basic terms why.

Answer 6

Iran is not an Arab country- Arabs hate them- why stop the division- Iran also has a large unhappy population that wants the west back. Also, it's much bigger than Iraq- and I guess, Iraq falling would encourage Iranian rebels.

Answer 7

To invade a country you have to set up some sanctions first, to make it very poor.
See we started with that slowly...... in 10, 15 years we are going to deal with Iran Coz by then it will be in its knees.

Answer 8

I say we just concentrate on taking them out now. There in the same area and lets just get everyone we need to since are troops are in the region any way.

Answer 9

To big to complicated to achive. Saddam Hussein was a dictator that people knew was ruthless and cruel. That made it easyer to sell the idea of attacking Iraq.

Answer 10

The intelligence had typographical errors; meaning to type IRAN instead of IRAQ.