Do u belive in big bang?

Question

Im not sure with this theory because the universe started its journey with a premival atom and how a atom can expand into a universe.what u think what will be the size of the atom.If its large enough to cover a infinte distance or small as an atom?..

Answer 1

Nope.
Incorrect. The universe neither expands nor shrinks. It wasn't created and had no beginning, it will never end. Nothing can be 'outside' the universe. It is nothing, but it contains everything.

Answer 2

Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===== ========
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================

Answer 3

I don't believe in believing.

It is not a matter of "believing" in the big bang, it is simply a matter of examining the evidence and seeing where it leads. The evidence indicates that our universe is expanding. That is well established. The COBE & WMAP satellites have pegged the age of our universe to 13.7 billion years. We also have the cosmic background radiation which permeates our universe--the "echo" of the big bang.

There are numerous other key bits of evidence indicating the correctness and accuracy of the inflationary hot big bang model. Is that how our universe began? Most likely, based on the evidence available to us at this time. Is that model likely to change? No. It would take a lot of new observations going off in an entirely new direction to overturn this model. Big bang cosmology is as likely to be wrong as Einstein's General Relativity. It MAY be wrong on a few minor details, in that is it incomplete. Otherwise, we're pretty much stuck with it as it is.

Answer 4

Yes I do. Try not to think that everything came from an atom. Rather, all the matter that exists now was once compressed in to a point that was almost incalculably minute, hot and dense.

About 13,7 billion years ago, that point suddenly expanded. In the tiniest fraction of a second, it went from being infinitesimal to being everywhere.

Answer 5

From the way you're trying to describe what you *think* the 'Big Bang' was, it's pretty obvious what you have is a bunch of 2'nd hand information from some one who didn't have a clue.

Find a copy of Stephen Hawkins, "A Short History of Time" and learn all about it from someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

Doug

Answer 6

Yes, I believe in "Big Bang". What is interesting is that although the initial materia (very hot and dense) expanded, it is not slowing down, but is expanding faster and faster.
"Big Bang" is a modern theory, but i think it is the most plausible.

Answer 7

nicely, there are a number of different theories besides. it is the main believed. Scientists studied exterior the earth and observed what could be "leftovers" or the aftermath of the huge Bang explosion. it sort of feels real because of the fact in the event that they observed the electromagnetic rays and container around the universe, it extremely is extremely plenty attainable that the huge Bang concept is actual.

Answer 8

but it wasn't a little atom who did the big bang...it was a kind of perticule so compressed ...to containing whole universe ..recent observations proved that "the universe is expanding" ...scientific now r sure that our univers is expending!

Answer 9

I believe PART of the big bang theory. I don't believe that the atom just explode because it wanted to, I believe that God got mad a hit the atom very very hard and it exploded. Then, He decided to do something with His new creation and He made the planets, satellites, and life on the Earth and some other planets in the universe, just not in out solar system. There could be life on a planet in a solar system in our galexy, just not our solar system, well, besides us, duh.

Answer 10

That's not really what big bang theory means. You might want to look it up before dismissing it - you've got it wrong.