Is anybody else noticing the media's double standards are particularly two faced of late?

Question

Two cases in point the so called Plame Affair and the firing of procecutors who would not go after Democrat Cronies.

Janet Reno fired the same people in these positions and the media did not say anything.

Answer 1

Yes, they haven't been stopped, so they see no need to control themselves. They will continue to get worse as times goes on, too.

Another good example is the whole global warming issue. They continue to harp on the idea of it being man-made and the carbon footprint. They practically ignore the studies about the other planets warming and it being solar caused. I only heard about the solar warming through my dad and the radio, then I researched it online. But the media has been absolutely no help at all.

Answer 2

I trust you one hundred%. stupid people get known for going to varsity and having a level in basket weaving so that they get the proper spots in jobs like political positions. enable's seem at yet another element too. If the jerk-offs doesn't be incomes income from the automobile marketplace on the area, then they could have under no circumstances given the tremendous 3 a normal out or a assisting hand. money from searching is going into conservation so the politicians are S.O.L. and that is, what i imagine, the major reason guns are continuously below attack from politicians, because shall we face it, someone can kill with a toothbrush, and that has occurred a number of circumstances in our prisons.

Answer 3

The press reports what our elected representatives are doing. Since there were Congressional hearings on these two issues, the press reported what happenned in the hearings.

<<>>

The fact that you believe that does demonstrate a failure of the your news source to adequately inform you. It is true that every recent president has replaced most of all of these prosecutors when they took office. Since that was a common practice, it was not news and was not reported when either the Clinton or Bush administrations did so. However, replacing a group of the prosecutors in mid-term, in the middle of investigations, is unprecedented. Unprecedented action by an administration is newsworthy. If you did not know that the action was unprecedented you might want to find a better source for news.

Here is an example from an AP report:

"Presidents commonly begin their first term by replacing most, if not all, U.S. attorneys. Presidents Clinton in 1993 and Bush in 2001 replaced nearly all U.S. attorneys in the Justice Department's 93 districts nationwide. But it's rare for these attorneys to be dismissed later in a president's term except in cases of malfeasance.

A Feb. 22 report by the bipartisan Congressional Research Service showed five cases in 25 years in which U.S. attorneys were forced to resign."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003618748_attorneys15.html

Answer 4

Two different situations with two entirely different set of circumstances. Explain the supposed two-facedness of the coverage?

I don't see the media as being any better or any worse right now. They're just as lazy and sensationalist as always.

Answer 5

That's the media for you! They build you up to bring u down.