Are you for or against state funding for faith based schools?

Question

Coming form a private religious institution, I believe that private religious intstituions should be state funded. The only funding that we recieve is that of the diocease, tutition, and chariable donations, where as public schools receive funding from the state, lottery, vouchers and also chariable funds. Why can't 75% or even 50% of the school taxes go to the private schools in which the paren'ts children are attending and the other 25%-50% go to the public schools and vice versa if it was a public school student? We are still funding for both schools. Also why can't the lottery be for private schools as well even though that the lottery states that the money is going toward education? It never stated it directly for public education only but requirements for a lottery scholarship only apply to those high school graduates from public schools. What do you think?

Answer 1

I agree that faith based and alternative independent schools (ie. non-government schools) should receive state funding.

One argument is that the parents of the children who attend non-government schools pay their income taxes, so their children are just as much entitled to each government education dollar as public school children.

Secondly, non-government schools actually save the Govt hundreds of millions of dollars in education funding. The reasoning here is that non-government schools are approx 70% funded from non - federal government sources. If the parents of these children suddenly decided to send their children to public schools on mass (say because Govt cut its private school funding) then the cost and quality of public education would blow out significantly.

Answer 2

Which faith based schools would you like for the state to fund? The reason that the schools are private is because they want to design their own curriculum and admit their kind of students. If you would like to receive state funding, then go to a public school. The local Diocese doesn't give any money to my school nor should they be required to do so. Parents make a choice when they send their children to private school. They know about the tuition and dependence on donations. It's a choice!

Answer 3

I am also against this. I believe that the separation between church and state should be respected and that the boundaries should not be tested. The reasoning behind the fact that Private schools are not state funded is because the parent's tuition goes to the school each year, while public school students do not pay tuition. The system works well and I think we should keep it this way.

Answer 4

Absolutely not. The main point of private, religious schools is to keep your children from learning those dangerous 'facts' that public schools teach. Sure, you have the right to shelter your children from reality all you want - but don't expect the rest of us to pay for it. If you don't want your children learning anything, that's not our problem.

And yes, I DID attend a religious school. And I didn't learn much. I had a lot of catching up to do later when I found out that no, there really isn't a god.

Answer 5

i think of you are able to desire to concentration greater on the legality of that subject than on what feels like a taxpayer's rant. Argument a million: all of us pay taxes to fund issues we don't care approximately. some people oppose giving welfare to people or the Iraq conflict yet they nonetheless ought to pay taxes. Argument 2: form of pointless. If the conventional public would not desire public-funded faith based colleges, then they might desire to vote whoever stated it out of workplace in the subsequent election. right here in usa, virtually any argument might nicely be supported/refuted with the help of the form. i don't be attentive to what's in Canada's shape yet i might merely decide what federal/provincial rules relating separation of church and state are. i do no longer help publicly-funded faith based colleges. In usa we've a voucher device that enables undesirable little ones to attend inner maximum schools (non secular or non-non secular) at a discounted cost. yet no money is promptly given from the government to the school or the non secular team that governs it. the explanation is that the government has an pastime in reaping rewards the academic welfare of the youngster, yet government shouldn't fund non secular communities.

Answer 6

I am against this. If private schools want to be private then they should be self-reliant and not use public tax dollars when they need it, also private school is a choice an alternative to public schools but one that costs money and heres the key word is Private.

Answer 7

Because the parents pay for their kid to go to the private schools therefore not leaving the private schools needing for state funding.

Answer 8

I am against this notion.

Let's do a little test.

Would you be for state funding for a Nazi-based school?

Would you be for state funding for an Atheist-based school?

Would you be for state funding for a North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)-based school?

I think you get the point.

When the U.S. government funds one private school, then they will likely be FORCED to fund ALL others.

Instead, you may consider a tax-credit for those families who send their children to private schools.


Good Luck....

Answer 9

I have sent my son to a Private School..but my taxes go towards the public school. I feel that if those who send there kids to a private school ,then the taxes paid should go to that school...This will also cut down the cost to attend that school.