English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Yes. These people just want to give up. The Terrorists will not leave us alone if we leave Iraq. What about before Iraq. What about the first trade center attack. GWB was not around then and they attacked us . The USS Cole, Embassies etc. were attacked before Iraq and before GWB.

2007-03-18 05:54:08 · answer #1 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 1 5

If you ignore his disastrous foreign policy and look only at his domestic security policy then I suppose you could argue that way but if you believe that alienating every other country on the planet has made th US safer then just try pissing off your neighbours every day for a month and see if you are more secure in the end. I would wager that they would be less likely to keep an eye on your place if you pissed them off than if you where a good, cooperative guy. Dub'ya has tried to bully and threaten his way to cooperation and in doing so has made the US a pariah state with no-one willing to watch its back. Now you may say that the US is big and powerful and doesn't need international allies but think again. Every nation needs to act in a way consistent with good global citizenship; to offer help when needed, to act with restraint in matters of international diplomacy and to be a friend to its allies. Keep your friends close but your enemies closer is good advise but it is not really better to be feared than loved (thanks to Machiavelli).

2007-03-18 13:02:04 · answer #2 · answered by Duncan w ™ ® 7 · 3 2

No, because we are being invaded via illegal aliens and he is not only kissing up to part of the problem (Mexico's government) he is opening up our roads and highways to Mexico's truckers where there will be more accidents and citizens killed.

If he were protecting these United States then we wouldn't have the illegal alien problem that we have today. You DO realize that those that did 9/11 WERE ILLEGAL ALIENS?

2007-03-18 12:59:52 · answer #3 · answered by hera 4 · 1 2

Well he let 9/11 happen: over 3,000 dead Americans
He let Iraq war happen: over 3,000 dead Americans
He messed up Katrina: over 2,500 dead Americans
He's let millions of illegal immigrants into the US.
He let N. Korea get a nuke bomb.
He's about to let Iran get a nuke bomb.
And he's created thousands of new terrorists by invading & not quickly winning the wars in Iraq & Afganhistan

2007-03-18 12:54:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

He has caused more damage than most terrorists. If that is "protection" in the re-pubics' dictionary, then sure.

2007-03-18 14:11:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Of course he has, look at all those people he protected on
9/11. He is after all the final decider, isn't he?

2007-03-18 12:53:07 · answer #6 · answered by Carpe diem 6 · 5 3

That's a no brainer. The protesters have don't nothing but trash D.C. They have not done one thing for this country except complain about things they can't control.

2007-03-18 12:53:50 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 2 4

There weren't any Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq before President AWOL lied us into war.

2007-03-18 12:53:23 · answer #8 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 3 4

Yes

2007-03-18 12:52:44 · answer #9 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 2 5

Yes,actually.
And history will most likely recognize that fact.
In the meantime the George Sorros zombie anarchists continue to fuel hatred around the world for the one guy who is standing up for all of us (including these wasters.)

2007-03-18 12:53:06 · answer #10 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 3 6

fedest.com, questions and answers