in the middle of the Iraq civil war?
2007-03-18 05:31:01 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Years ago, the Bush administration said it is time to act upon Darfur, but as we all know, they are keen on reneging. We need to send aid, but not necessarily get involved. We do need to leave Iraq too. We will only get further bogged down if we stay.
2007-03-18 05:59:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The difference is that there are acts of genocide going on there. Yes Saddam was evils against the Kurds and there were acts of genocide there as well, however, Darfur is more large scale and of a different aspect. Did you watch Hotel Rwanda? Better yet, watch Pieces of April, it is a documentary and will open your eyes.
I would rather see us involved in humanitarian warfar, then in a war that noone seems to understand, because it certainly isn't against terrorism. Terror does not eminate from a single nation-state or even the two we have invaded. It is a global issue and should be fought that way. We should not be fighting it like we fought the cold war.
2007-03-18 05:39:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If there is oil in Darfur, send the army to capture the wells otherwise, take no action. It really is none of our business if people want a civil war. We've had lots of them in our UK history. Just let people sort out their own problems.
In the meantime, give generously to any charity collecting for aid to Africa etc.
2007-03-18 05:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, the liberals are looking for a hollywood ending. Think about it. The only agenda of the liberal party is justification. They want to moralize abortion, increase dependence on welfare programs, and legalize drug use. There is no "movement" in terms of forward thinking about the long term effects of their destruction. The war gave liberals a worldwide opportunity to prove the weakness of America - liberals. If you were in China and listening to liberals cry about a generals personal opinion of homesexuality - would you be afraid to attack America? Liberals really do not care about the War in Iraq, they are delighted with the forum they have been provided to talk about more important issues.
2007-03-18 05:52:30 · answer #4 · answered by Terrie 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, however Iraq is not in a civil war.
If they were, the whole country would be involved.
Obviously, you do not pay attention to the fact that Iran is behind all of this.
2007-03-18 05:34:33 · answer #5 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
because of the fact they might study the writing on the wall that the troop surge is working. they choose some ingredient else to run on for the 08 election and having the protection stress in a conflict looked as though it might paintings out nicely for them in the final election.
2016-10-02 08:06:46 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We didn't cause Darfur. We caused Iraq's civil war problems single-handedly.
2007-03-18 05:34:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The people in Darfur want to be helped.
2007-03-18 05:35:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As long as our national interest isn't under consideration, libs want us to be involved in every skirmish, and the troops be damned!
2007-03-18 05:37:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sudan IS in civil war. Iraq is not.
Here is an article that might interest you....
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1530762.ece
2007-03-18 05:41:56 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋