peter_12890
2007-03-18 05:28:49 · 10 answers · asked by peter d 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
FIELDING WOULD HAVE REJOICED THE INDIAN FANS AS WELL AS THE CRICKETERS BECAUSE THEY WOULD GET A DEFINITE SCORE WHICH THEY CAN CHASE EASILY WITH PROPER PLANNING AND STRATEGIES.
2007-03-18 05:33:53 · answer #1 · answered by divya r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With due respect, it would have been best if INDIA would not have gone for WC. Most of our players are fit for making ads & money, rather than playing the game from heart. The chairman himself Sharad Pawar, is a man who wants to have the handsome money of the board laying to be in his pockets, I even doubt if he can write the word CRICKET in English.Today I watched all the news channels; almost all the channels are blaming the captain, Rahul Dravid., Virender Sehwag & the coach. Rahul at least scored some 2 digit numbers, & Virender Sehwag there are no words to tell about him, he is just a burden on the team & a man to make news for the media.
Why no one is pointing any figures to the Master Blaster, who even could make 2 digits & for his 7 runs he took 2 digit number balls. A team like Bangladesh, Sachin has hardly performed, which is a shame. Last but, not the least, our blue boys needs to take some coaching of fielding & balling from Bangladesh. I'm sure we will not win the WC, Bangladesh, keep it going I am sure you will atleast make it to super 6, best of luck.
2007-03-18 05:53:23 · answer #2 · answered by Jairam K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batting is the right option. However once the team starts batting first it must aim for a target of minimum 220 runs and then build the score towards 300+ depending on available wickets
2007-03-18 05:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by Santhosh S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By seeing the performance of Indian Team, it feel if they had batted second, the result would have been different. I feel Dravid did not read the pitch well before deciding to bat first. It would have been better to chase when playing against low ranked teams.
2007-03-18 13:49:40 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is very easy to say after event/match is over.To bat first was team India decision
2007-03-19 23:17:42 · answer #5 · answered by balkrishna c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
fielding would have been a good decision...
the banglas wuldn't have scored many runs
chasing the target would have been easy
2007-03-18 05:37:33 · answer #6 · answered by :( The Cric luver :) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our Indian boys play like "a slow motion" show!
No stength!
2007-03-18 06:12:50 · answer #7 · answered by Maliha S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now we know the power satta dons who have the power to reverse the result of any match between any two team for the money.teams and their managers are involved.
2007-03-18 05:39:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of-course they should have fielded and chased, playing to their strength.
2007-03-18 05:37:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither.....they should have stayed in the pavillion......
batting first...( we know the result)
batting second....(we would have lost to thier spninners.. and feilders...)
2007-03-18 05:48:46 · answer #10 · answered by importer911 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋