What are your views on Camilla Princess of Wales?

Question

Believe it or not, though she is called Duchess or Cornwall, her actual title is Princess of Wales. The entire issue with Diana is still very sensitive so not to upset anyone too much they named her differently.

Camilla is the Princess of Wales according to the law. Please follow the link to get more details. Read what it says under her photograph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Princess_of_Wales

Answer 1

She is ugly, no lady, no princes, she is old, OK these are not her fault, but she did something that world will never forget (she and that ugly prince), breaking the heart of a fantastic, beautiful woman, breaking a home and finally cause of a tragedy.
Because of her actions worlds dislike her. She just had a luck and must have done something sick to capture an ugly prince's dark heart.
That’s what she is and s he will pay back in hell.

Answer 2

I think that Camilla Princess of Wales, Duchess of Cornwall is a lovely lady who should by rights be known as Queen Camilla when Prince Charles Becomes King George VII or is it VIII? Sorry, I am an American & it is difficult to keep up with the roman numerals. I like King George. People should leave both Charles & Camilla alone!

Answer 3

Toby Young is an oddball. This issue was raised at the time Charles and Camilla got married, and as you yourself quoted in your own question, the Lord Chancellor ruled that it would be a legal marriage or they wouldn't have gone ahead with it. “Members of the Royal Family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act of 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales must therefore be performed by Anglican clergy under either a Special or Common Licence" is ridiculous. It has always been possible for them to be married by banns in the Church of England and even if the opinion that they are excluded from civil marriage is correct, they could still do that. It just so happens that all the Royal Family are married by special licence because marriage by banns or common licence is only possible in a parish church, and cathedrals or "royal peculiars" like Westminster Abbey aren't technically parish churches so marriage in them is only possible by special licence. Lord Falconer was correct. The Human Rights Act 1998 was imposed on the UK by the European Union and EU law overrides British law. The problem with that line in the Marriage Acts 1836 and 1949 is that they didn't define what the Royal Family is. That makes those parts of the Acts unenforceable and if anyone took this to court, the court would undoubtedly rule that the marriage is legal as it is not clear that it isn't. And even if the court ruled that the marriage was illegal, the European Court of Human Rights would overturn that verdict.

Answer 4

Thats the only consort of Prince of Wales that has some immoral past. Wales is a former catholic state I wonder why those authorities blinded , I wonder why the two sons of Charles permit it while they can marry later and gift it to their royal girlfriends to bethrothe them, so the title will be on a descent ground. And Why carry the genocide of Princess Diana including the grand mother of the princess of Armenia what an immoral furnification, She had no son or daughter by Charles and She had no right to carry such title.

Answer 5

I detest her.

You are correct however, that she is Princess of Wales and had it not been for that fact that her marriage to Charles had to be handled with as much damage control as possible, she would have used the title. To make the wretched creature more acceptable to the British people, she took the title of Duchess of Cornwall.

Although it was announced that when Charles becomes King, his tart would be known as Princess Consort, I have no doubt that depending on the mood of the country at the time of the accession of Charles (who apparently wishes to be known as George VII) Camilla will more than likely have the title of Queen. She's been shoved down the throats of everyone now that it's doubtful there will be any complaints about a Queen Camilla.

Answer 6

She is not, and will not be, Princess of Wales. Duke of Cornwall is one of Charles titles, and she takes her title from that. The Princess of Wales inevitably becomes Queen, and Camilla will not hold that title.

Charles should have married her years ago, long before he ever met Diana. She is the love of his life, and they have been through more than most people would in two lifetimes. I'm delighted they are finally together. More power to them!

Answer 7

Clearly, Prince Charles is very much in love with her and has always been.

He could have spared himself, Camilla, Diana, and the world a lot of heartache by marrying Camilla thirty years ago.

Too bad he waited until he was middle-aged to grow a backbone.

Answer 8

I'd heard that before, on TV one day, just before Camilla married Charles. They sure shushed THAT up in a hurry, too! Left me wondering why people said she won't be queen, when the articled I'd heard said she WILL be.

I don't like her. Nor him. They made Diana's life a horror, didn't they?

I saw on our news today that Camilla is going to be a grandmother.

Answer 9

My overwhelming opinion on this whole issue is that Charles should have married Camilla in the first place, even if it meant giving up his right to the throne, which he is never going to get anyway. He obviously wanted her in the first place, and used Diana as a showcase wife, and a child-producer. A great deal of hurt could have been avoided years ago, had he had the guts to go with his heart.

Answer 10

She seems like a very pleasant down to earth lady (as much as you could be at in upper class circles anyways) and although I completely disagree with the manner her and Prince Charles conducted their affair while married, I think that its great that they are both finally happy together - its quite obvious what a perfect match they are.

Answer 11

You are incorrect she does not hold the title Princess of Wales.