2007-03-18 02:17:41 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes he is its all political offence we cannot understand what they are trying to do once i remember bush was a men who helps osama bin laden to fight against russia so he responsible for that
2007-03-18 02:41:30 · answer #1 · answered by shah baaz paktun s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If, in fact, he is not, he certainly is responsible for not reacting to the memos he received, warning him that it was going to happen.
He needed 9/11.
He was having a failed presidency.
Unemployment was on a rise, the economy was in shambles in just the first few months he took office.
His approval ratings were sinking daily.
Then he, and his administration, sat around on their hands and let 9/11 happen, and even arranged for the bin Ladens to flee this country, via jet passage, when there was a no-fly order in all American skies.
They had the freedom and privilege to fly when that freedom and privilege had been revoked for all of us Americans because they had big bucks and were kissing friends to Mr. Bush, himself.
The man, and his entire administration, and all of his supporters, should be held accountable, but guess what.
Money, in America, is power, none of them will ever see a day behind bars, but one fine day, we will all have to face our maker, and if you're afraid of terrorism, just wait until the Great Judgment day!
.
2007-03-18 02:39:36 · answer #2 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Bush was not responsible. 19 Islamic fanatics with no regard for humanity crashed 4 airliners into the WTC, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. Damn them.
2007-03-18 02:22:59 · answer #3 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, George Bush is the President of the United States. There is a terrorist organization called al-Queda that carried out the September 11 attacks; the leader of that organization is a man named Osama bin Laden.
Hope this helps!
2007-03-18 02:23:24 · answer #4 · answered by Independent 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No terrorists and the Clinton Government who had the chance to take out Bin Laden Al-Quaida and didn't.
2007-03-18 17:17:21 · answer #5 · answered by kwilfort 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not -- the wheels were in motion for 9/11 long before he took office. America, all of us, were asleep at the switch because we didn't really think anything like that was likely or even possible.
2007-03-18 02:22:52 · answer #6 · answered by pilot 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, he wasn't responsible. The lunatics flying planes into the twin towers, and flying flight 93, were responsible.
2007-03-18 02:23:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
How can he be? According to a lot of folks here on Y!A, GWB is a dumb chimp. He can not read, speak or spell properly. He has a low IQ. With that being said, how could he have possibly masterminded such an operation? Is he dumb or a genius? You can't have it both ways...
2007-03-18 02:23:57 · answer #8 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
another lame attempt to shield the terrorist murderers.
Everyone knows that it was the handiwork of 19 Islamic fanatics with no regard for human lives.
2007-03-18 02:28:53 · answer #9 · answered by Smart Indian 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I can't figure out if you are truly ignorant, trying to be funny, or just incite people? I'll have to say that you accomplished the first description though.
2007-03-18 02:24:29 · answer #10 · answered by Political Enigma 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋