if you said yes:
what if his victim was a child? does that change anything?
2007-03-18 02:06:39 · 18 answers · asked by dreamer 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I don't know, It depends who he killed and why he did it. In self defence then possibly yes. If it were a child than NO WAY. There is no excuse for hurting a child.
2007-03-18 02:12:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It depends on the circumstances and the intent. If a person intentionally murders a child in cold blood, then no I could not overlook it because I believe that person is heartless. On the other hand, if the child was about to take the person's life or a family membe'rs life for no reason and at random, I could see in a moment of panic that it could happen.
2007-03-18 02:20:19 · answer #2 · answered by sam 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could overlook the murder of an adult. For some reason I can't overlook the murder of a child because if this person is capable of killing someone who is defenseless then he is too cold blooded for me.
There could be NO EXCUSE at all to kill a child.......
2007-03-18 02:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by mwha1369 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that is one of those questions you really don't know until you are in that situation---like jumping in a lake to save someone from drowning or pulling someone out of a fire. I would think you would need to consider that person's whole character, the facts of the crime (was it outright murder or involuntary manslaughter) and if the person is truly remorseful. I think the same would apply if the victim was a child.
2007-03-18 02:13:32 · answer #4 · answered by flipdout2 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the circumstances if it was an adult.
A child, no. Murder is defined as the intentional taking of life, and I could never see past taking the life of a child. . .
2007-03-18 02:11:37 · answer #5 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
am i able to (respectfully) say I believe Gill in this, because of the fact it extremely is extremely demanding to tell what offence he replaced into committed of. He might have have been given out early for stable behaviour, in basic terms served area of his sentence, is he which comprise his time on remand? 4/5 years exhibits some thing in the mid variety, theft, GBH some thing alongside those lines. even in spite of the shown fact that it might additionally be some thing like drugs/people trafficking. wish this facilitates Bruver
2016-10-02 07:56:06 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think I could overlook murder,that says something about the person,how seriously cold they are,no conscience,feelings,SOUL,my opinion,if you can kill someone in cold blood,your not human. Self defense however is a different story.
2007-03-18 02:11:06 · answer #7 · answered by grmat 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Im not sure I can feel safe around a murder so I would have to say that I dont think I could still be friends but thats just my opinion.
2007-03-18 02:10:20 · answer #8 · answered by shepp959 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have a friend that did time for what I would call justifiable homicide or self defense and I'm O.K. with it, that said I don't think I could ever trust a cold blooded murderer or anyone that killed for no good reason.
2007-03-18 02:13:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i wouldnt be able to get past the murder - even though he has served his time there is still a murderer lurking beneath the surface. I would certainly be civil and decent but would not befriend him
2007-03-18 02:42:50 · answer #10 · answered by pinkchampagne 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋