English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Evaluate Giles Cory's behavior in court. Did he handle himself well or recklessy?

2007-03-18 01:03:54 · 2 answers · asked by myplan 1 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

2 answers

Both, actually.

Giles Corey was very outspoken; this could get himself and others in trouble - that could be called reckless. Earlier, he got his wife, Martha, in trouble by telling Rev. Hale that she read strange books and this would make him forget his prayers (obviously he is not trying to damn his wife, but it works that way). Giles is embedded in an argument with Thomas Putnam about land that he believes rightfully belongs to John Proctor. Putnam is informed that his grandfather had a history of willing away land that he did not own. While the argument does not involve him, Giles feels the need to interject in court when he supports Proctor’s claim by saying, “That’s God’s truth; he nearly willed away my north pasture." This leads him down the path of telling the court that Putnam is lying about Jacobs, but when he is questioned on how he can prove Putnam is lying, Corey then handles himself well.

He handles himself well in the sense that he understands the rules of the court (he won't let them hit him with contempt as it is a hearing); then, when Judge Danforth does call him into "proper court" Corey is the first honorable witness who refuses to fall prey to the insanity. He will not give up the name of his friend, and therefore dies a heroic death under stones.

2007-03-18 01:44:45 · answer #1 · answered by blakesleefam 4 · 0 0

Recklessly.

2007-03-18 01:51:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers