2007-03-18 00:38:59 · 21 answers · asked by qwerty 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
i think some people got it wrong, i would never want him out, i suggest he should die, and save several million £
for better usage
2007-03-18 12:46:05 · update #1
Nope, why not just kill him now and save us money!
And anyone who thinks this child killer should be looked after and doesn't deserve to die needs their head looking at!
2007-03-18 00:41:24 · answer #1 · answered by Ni 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i would hang the f ucker that wont happen because to many people are against the death penalty that is the problem with this country the ones who say he should not be killed and should do his sentence are as bad as huntley probably worse in my book and its only going to get worse not better even time you recieve your pay packet just think you are paying for him in a small way
2007-03-19 04:00:18 · answer #2 · answered by danny boy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I used to hate the idea of capital punsihment, but in cast iron cases like his it seems pretty clear to me that it should be brought back. What is the POINT in keeping him alive just so that he can linger in jail? He's never going to contribute anything to society - just continue taking.
They should leave him in his cell with a strong leather belt like they did for Fred West and have done with it.
2007-03-18 09:32:40 · answer #3 · answered by sallybowles 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a good reason to bring back the death penalty if he's never going to get out, why not speed the process up a bit! I don't see why I should pay to keep him alive!
2007-03-18 08:59:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of our government easy option of "The Death Penalty" is Barbaric, we unfortunately have to put up with the alternative,& if that means he stays inside until he dies so be it rather than allow him out on good behavior to do the same thing again.
2007-03-18 09:06:12 · answer #5 · answered by edison 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they brought back the death penalty is would save a hell of a lot of money to keep this scum alive and free up some prison space.
2007-03-18 12:08:05 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's worth every penny.
Prison is not just about punishing him, it's also about protecting society from him.
He needs keeping behind bars to protect our kids, that's why he should be kept behind bars for ever. What price a child's life?
2007-03-18 19:37:07 · answer #7 · answered by Captain Sarcasm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"If everyone took an eye for an eye, the whole world would be blind." (Ghandi). what kind of message does it send out if we punish murderers by murdering them, kill him and he's gone, no punishment no nothing. and it turns more people into killers. let him rot in jail surrounded by people who are going to make his life hell for what he did to those girls. he's gonna have to live a life constantly being punished in a variety of ways and although i don't believe that i have the right to say who gets what punishment ido wish him a very very long life in there.
2007-03-18 07:58:24 · answer #8 · answered by betterwaystoselfdestruct 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He should have been executed, but listening to the do-gooders he cant be because he might be innocent. That's the sort of thing we are up against. We know he is guilty he even confessed to the killings,so why do we have to be ruled by do-gooders all the time
2007-03-18 15:08:26 · answer #9 · answered by cassidy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All those who have taken the life of an innocent person, or raped an innocent person, should spend the rest of their lives in jail, but not in the lap of luxury. They should have to work for their living.
2007-03-18 08:19:20 · answer #10 · answered by The Questioner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋