it not enough big for be of the category "planet" now is named as a "dwarfplanet" is like the category after planet
2007-03-16 22:20:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Is Pluto a planet???? Yes and no...
Well for starters, Pluto is just too small. In the neighborhood where Pluto lives? Planets are supposed to be huge. The Jovian planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune are 20 to 300 times the size of the Earth, and Pluto is really small compared to the Earth, smaller than our Moon. Kind of stands out.
And Pluto is not made out the same material as the Jovians. The large planets are mostly gigantic spheres of gas, mostly hydrogen and helium. Likely there are no solid surfaces, only denser and denser gas all the way in. Pluto is a small solid world of methane, water, carbon dioxide and ammonia ices, maybe a little rock and with a just hint of atmosphere (that freezes out and falls as snow in her "winter").
And third, Pluto's orbit is the most eccentric (oval shaped) and the most tilted to the plane that the rest of the planets orbit in. Also, Pluto is locked in a resonance with Neptune's orbit and comes closer to the sun than Neptune sometimes.
There were theories that Pluto was a lost moon of Neptune but that was before we discovered she a has one large moon (Charon) half her size (pretty much, this system is a double planet) and recently two other teeny-tiney moons (Nix and Hydra).
Pluto seems like she cant be an ejected moon-she must have formed on her own and seems to be part of an entire army of small icey-dwarf objects that circle just outside Neptune's orbit in what is known as the Kuiper belt. We have no idea of how many or how large these objects may be, hundreds???? NOT "planets" proper, hence the new term "dwarf planet" where Pluto is king.
But... I still think Pluto SHOULD be called a planet because of historical reasons (discovered by an American, financed by Percival Lowell, Tombaugh's life story, etc).
2007-03-18 00:58:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by stargazergurl22 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was always a debate on wether or not Pluto was a true planet like the others, or just a captured asteroid-like body, partly because of it's small size, and partly because of it's odd orbit. It's orbit actually takes it inside of Neptune's orbit for part of it's "year", plus it's orbital plane is not in line with the other planets, but is at an angle in relation to the others.
Also, recent discoveries of new, non-planetary bodies in the solar system that are actually larger than Pluto have been made in the last few years (Vesta, I believe is the name of one of them) and all of these new discoveries have sort of chipped away at the idea of Pluto being a planet.
2007-03-16 23:50:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by the phantom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The International Astronomical Union decided that Pluto was no longer a planet. The reason is that while Pluto is round, orbits the sun, and has three moons, it has not cleared (via gravity) its own orbit of debris. Instead, they decided to classify it as a "dwarf planet".
See the details below.
RESOLUTION 5A
The IAU therefore resolves that "planets" and other bodies in our Solar System, except satellites, be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:
(1) A "planet" [footnote 1] is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape [footnote 2] , (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
(3) All other objects [footnote 3] except satellites orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar-System Bodies".
Footnote 1: The eight "planets" are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
Footnote 2: An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.
Footnote 3: These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.
RESOLUTION 6A
The IAU further resolves:
Pluto is a "dwarf planet" by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects.
2007-03-17 09:23:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Otis F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
IAU(international astronomical union) Decision
The debate came to a head in 2006 with an IAU resolution that created an official definition for the term "planet". According to this resolution, there are three main conditions for an object to be considered a 'planet':
1. The object must be in orbit around the Sun.
2. The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
3. It must have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
Pluto fails to meet the third condition. The IAU further resolved that Pluto be classified in the simultaneously created dwarf planet category, and that it act as prototype for a yet-to-be-named category of trans-Neptunian objects, in which it would be separately, but concurrently, classified.
2007-03-17 00:01:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by neumor 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually pluto has been a disputable planet since its discovery. its orbit's ellipticity is very much different from other planets. Also when we categerize the planets on the basis of their properties it does not fit well in any of the category. so scientist always want to redefine the planets to decide whether pluto is planet or not
This issue becum more disputable after the discoveries of many steeler objects near pluto one of them is even bigger than pluto so we decided not to consider pluto as a planet bcoz if we consider it as a planetr then there are lot of other steller objects after neptune that behaviour is very similar to pluto
2007-03-17 01:48:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by fiza 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pluto was downgraded because it is so small and it's orbit so erratic that it does not exert any gravitational influence on any of the other planets. I guess the fact that it has a moon orbiting it is purely coincidental! I'm don't agree with the designation, but I don't make those decisions.
2007-03-17 00:39:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kenneth H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
BEcause the technology improved and they found out it was a dwarf Planet.....
2007-03-16 22:21:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Abdul 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Scientists now think it is a big chunk of ice and it will eventually melt.
2007-03-16 23:43:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Answers 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
bcoz it is not within the limit of Solar system
2007-03-16 22:18:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋