English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the people of california voted,the american way,the way are abe lincoln,george washington and many other americans did ,when they wanted a change.sure there were people who wanted the south to continue slavery,but people who wanted to change such a,"crime",either fought,voted,or accepted the change.my point is,america we are not a dictatorship,we voted legalization of medical marijuana.why cannot you accept that? you allow prescriptins of vicodine,valium,not to mention the fact you don't even need a prescription to buy a bottle of jack daneils.this is a natzi attitude the fed's have against us californians,also pretty hipocrittible of you,"not allowing us to fulfill are american dream",a organic medicine that God gave us,unlike the alturnitive,a greddy politician with dirty hands and pockets filled with dirty money!

2007-03-16 22:03:48 · 8 answers · asked by bella 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

8 answers

technically, the states are "ruled" by the federal government. so, while medicinal mj is "legal" in Cali,it is not legal in the US. this means that while the CA police wont bust people with medicinal mj cards, the Feds can. Is it stupid? yes. Is it counterproductive? yes. but it happens. Massachusetts has legalized gay marriage, yet the fed gov't wont recognize the union. Its just too much bureaucracy. which sucks for the public.

*******

2007-03-17 21:04:29 · answer #1 · answered by PR 3 · 0 0

Hold it, what's this "you" bit. The people you are writing to are
not the Federal government.

But since you brought it up, there are states rights built into the constitution...yet even so, the Federal government does have the abilitity to over-ride states if decisions made by the states endanger the health and welfare of its citizens and/or violate their constitutional rights.

Personally, I could care less what you do in California. From what goes on out there, it often seems like a nation to itself
anyway.

I don't know if the government would overrule California's law or not. I did note that you compared valium with marijuana. I see where you are coming from but there is one main difference. Valium started out as a medication. Marijuana started out as illegal drug.

Yep ... shout it from the rooftops, smoke marijuana medicine and fulfill the American dream...but only in California.

2007-03-24 18:39:14 · answer #2 · answered by Northwest Womps 3 · 0 0

the heart of the invoice is there. new child screening is extreme for early detection and long term viability of young ones born with inborn blunders in metabolism and different detectable genetic illnesses. So increasing this methodology is notably plenty a competent ingredient. even in spite of the shown fact that, i might believe Dr. Paul in that any information gained from application might desire to be accrued anonymously and that the privateness rights and affected person archives of any new child that comes up valuable for a genetic disease might desire to be secure and could in no way be released w/o the determine's consent. stable question. the subject comes into play in that refusing the new child screening is equivalent to refusing lifesaving clinical look after your new child. in the journey that your new child occurs to have a metabolic disease that must be picked up with a $5 genetic attempt which you refuse, your new child ought to go through irreparable concepts harm from that disease or finally ends up death. and since the youngster can no longer settle for or deny clinical care of its very own accord the state steps in. for this reason i think you are able to no longer refuse the genetic tests. i think this in basic terms applies to the state/federal standards in spite of the shown fact that. some hospitals run much extra problems and that i think you may refuse those when you consider that its on a wellbeing facility by wellbeing facility foundation. could you be waiting to maintain all semblance of privateness with regard to the effect of those tests? unquestionably.

2016-10-02 06:42:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In California as a qualified patient you are entitled to legally grow, consume and transport marijuana as your medicine. Patients that suffer from migraines, anxiety, anorexia, Glaucoma, depression, cancer, AIDS, asthma and nausea benefit greatly from marijuana. As a legal patient, you can grow six mature plants, or 12 immature plants and carry up to 8 ounces as your personal medicine. Marijuana has been reported to be an effective and preferred treatment for many California patients. Check out this website to see if you pre-qualify www.accsocal.com.

2007-03-21 08:45:32 · answer #4 · answered by 420smiles 2 · 0 0

States rights vs federal government --hmmmm seems that we might have already fought a war about that--oh yeah didn't they call it the Civil War or something like that?

2007-03-24 17:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

right on, people just need to look at the history of the beautiful plant and its use through out history to realize it should be completely legal

2007-03-24 17:57:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Legalize!!

2007-03-24 07:15:41 · answer #7 · answered by RoxanneZG 3 · 0 0

Here, Here!

2007-03-24 06:16:39 · answer #8 · answered by kingqueenofspades 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers