And your own comments please
2007-03-16 20:39:54 · 27 answers · asked by Bruce L 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There are too many unanswered questions,
The white car that was supposed to be non existent was found a year later burned out, the owner dead.
Why did it take so long for Diana to be taken to the hospital.
Why did the Queen mention "Dark Forces" to Burrell.
If Diana was pregnant to Dodi then the future king of England's head of the Church of Englands half brother would have been Muslim.
Al Fayed would have had the future kings ear
Diana was an embarrassment to the Royals she would not accept Charles's infidelity as quietly as the Queen accepted Phillips.
The Royals do not live on the same planet as most of us, if you think they are just like us then you are very naive.
Philip is head of the Masons so they have many very
powerful friends in very high places.
2007-03-17 01:44:15 · answer #1 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
1. The driver of her car was under the influence of alcohol and prescription drugs.
2. He was speeding
3. There is a hump in the road just before the impact site. That causes cars to lift their front whels and they loose a little of their steering grip
4. The tunnel where the crash happened had a line of posts up the middle. There was no guard rail. If there had been a guard rail no-one in the car would have been seriously injured. There are or were two or three tunnels like that in Paris. Between 1 January 1997 and August 1997, seven people had died in accidents in these Paris tunnels in similar accidents. Those killed in this crash were the eighth, ninth and tenth.
5. Three people in the car were killed. The one who survived was sitting in the second most dangerous seat. He was wearing a seat belt. The other three were not. According to an car safety engineer who investigated the accident, if Diana and Dodi had been wearing seat belts they probably would have walked away from the wreck. Even the driver might have survived if he had been wearing a seat belt.
6. The crash was an average road fatality and the only unusual features were that three people were killed and one of them was the former wife of the heir to the throne of the United Kingdom.
7. You will not see these facts in a cheap gossip magazine or a cheap television program because they don't make a good story.
BTW, Robb is quite wrong. All the royal family have owned and used private cars which they have driven themselves, often alone. The Queen served as a driver during the second world war as soon as she was old enough to have a driving licence. At the time fatality rates for road accidents were vastly higher than they are today and she could have been killed by enemy action. She was the Heir Presumptive at the time.
2007-03-16 22:30:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Who believes she was murdered?
Mohammed al-Fayed, whose distress is understandable, as he lost a son.
Anyone else? Only half-wits who choose to ignore obvious evidence to the contrary. What a crap murder plot it would have been - you are leaving far too much to chance in a car accident.
Her bodyguard survived and recovered - that could so easily have been Diana. She would have survived if she'd chosen to wear a seat-belt.
A proper state sponsored murder would not have left so much to chance.
2007-03-17 00:15:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am 100% convinced that she and her boyfriend were killed.
1st, People in a higher social position, like Diane, Prime Ministers or Presidents, are surrounded by a powerful protection. Every step taken by those people, are very well observed and watched. These people represents great value to their people, therefore, their lives are extremely well protected.They are even trained to act in some ways to guarantee the higher level of protection. They are rarely allowed to drive, and if they do, their car will be installed with speed limits and a bunch of securities stuffs to provide protection. Theis car won't go too fast, it will keep a safe speed limits.
2nd, Everything related to politics and kingdoms are based on conspiracy. A look to the past and History, will show conspiracy as a way of having things done by leaders. What about Clepopata and the Kennedy's family, Marlyn Monroe and many others ? I know Cleopatra killed herself, but she built her life on conspiracy.
3rd, Diane's separation of Charlie and engagement with her boyfriend started to bring a new meaning to English people about the kingdom, a meaning of meanless. It wasn't something to be proud anymore. The royal proud was taken by Diane when she left Charlie. Maybe the kingdon wasn't that great (she prove that), but Diane was and she became great not only in England but in the rest of world. People from every part of the world respected and admired her in a way that Charlie and his royal family has never been respected and admiered before.
4th, If I well remmebered her car was a mercedes- benz, the car manufacture worried about the bed reputation this tragedy could bring to their company, hired and private investigation, that prove changes made on her car intended to put her life in dangerous and not safe as usually are done. As an example, the door's locks suffered changes that put her on higher risk, in case of accident or kidnaping.
2007-03-16 21:25:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I believed she was murdered, but why focus so much on her. MI5-MI6 have sanctioned many killings to cover their butt. We don't hear about them. Difference is Diana was in the public domain.
2007-03-17 04:23:31 · answer #5 · answered by barnowl 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She have been given right into a motor vehicle with a under the impact of alcohol driving force. He drove to quickly, and crashed. She became no longer donning a seat belt - her determination. No, it became stupidity all around, yet, it became no longer homicide.
2016-10-18 21:51:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No; the simple fact is she died because she was not wearing a seatbelt; that should be a lesson to everyone. The only people to blame - if someone must be blamed - are herself and the paparazzi who were chasing her.
2007-03-17 01:20:05 · answer #7 · answered by D B 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure she was, and that old bat sitting her castle knows it.
Couldn't stand that she was too popular and did what she wanted and not what she was told. Wimpy Charlie only married her to get a Heir, while he carried on with Camilla........... Adultery and murder nothing new to the royals
2007-03-16 20:58:15 · answer #8 · answered by tuppenybitz 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If there weren't extenuating circumstances it would look more like an accident. Grace Kelly too.
2007-03-16 20:44:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because it would just be too hard to get away with it. This accident has had more investigations than any other on earth. Tragic accident, unfortunetly.
2007-03-16 20:44:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋