English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Isnt it a term republicans use to justify their reasons for haste and waste and their corruption in governement? Nothing more than that.

People arequick to label anyone that opposes billions of mispent dollars, governement corruptions,and everythign else this administration has tried to cover up.

And it seems popular that when any channel, paper or radio show REPORTS these findings, illegalities or whatever you want to label them as -- its always the same response -- theyre liberal.

Heck even that republican congressman in todays CIA leak hearing asked the lady if she was democrat or republican.

It seems that liberal biased is the republicans way of justifying thei actions and trying to argue against anyone that tries to prove their hidden agendas?

Am I correct on this?

O'reilly example
who devotes half hi show to pointing the figner at everyone claiming they are this and they are that when its him who is the one thats actually the culprit of the very SPIN his no spin propogates

2007-03-16 18:52:12 · 6 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

So, real estate -- everyone but FOX is fair.
think about that for a minute...everyone else is wrong and fox is right.

man, Fox and o'reilly are really targeting the paranoid, is that their target audience?

2007-03-16 19:15:59 · update #1

6 answers

Republicans label anything not coming out of their own staged and censored news on FOX as liberal biased reporting. Ironic isn't.

2007-03-16 19:55:40 · answer #1 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0 0

What side of the isle used FORGED Documents..to try and influence the Presidential election....When caught said...Oh well yes it is a fraud...and to this day has not apologized to the Pres for the obvious fraud?
CNN, MSNBC, ABC,CBS, all use opinions in showing their news...OPINIONS ARE NOT FACTS
Their headlines and how items are reported are slanted.
Here is an example:
The Soldiers are in a gunfight with terrorists in a house...there are 7 terrorists that ran into the house and continued to fire at the soldiers...
The terrorists are killed....the headline is

SOLDIERS SLAUGHTER 3 CIVILIANS IN PURSUIT OF SUSPECTED INSURGENTS

yes there were 3 civilians in the building yes they died...but that should be the headline?

Not that the soldiers Killed 7 terrorists in an active gunfight...they made it sound like the soldiers were firing at SUSPECTED unarmed insurgents that were running..not ones firing at them from a house..just that our boys couldnt shoot...

That is the difference...at least FOX...gives both sides..they have liberal and conservative reporters...you get both sides..the libs also protest against this as they have the nerve to put a conservative spin...it is fair...that's why they are currently..THE #1 news show

2007-03-16 19:13:12 · answer #2 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 0 1

I observed Dan extremely speaking approximately how information departments have been as quickly as independent reporting shops that have been self sufficient of a television station's score branch. lower back interior the eighty's the television stations began to handle their information departments like quite a few different instruct. The thoughts have been difficulty to community approval and the information directors no longer had independence. whilst this happenned, lots of the networks took on an entertainment element. So, rather of reporting the "data", the information departments all started reporting the "data" with a spin that would entertain the objective audience. Newspapers used to limit comments to the editorial website, yet now, the lead thoughts in many papers can replicate the prejudice of the reporter. This happenned on the two the liberal and conservative aspects. because it is now, it is amazingly complicated to locate independent information on television, and a large style of people do no longer even understand what it became want to work out information that became written with the objective to "tell the customary public in an independent way". Is there an overpowering liberal bias interior the present media? possibly, yet it extremely is extra using actuality that the present objective (the president) is republican. in the process the Clinton years, it became plenty extra relaxing to attack the Democrats, and so, the prejudice became plenty extra conservative. this does not excuse the reality that the present administration is doing somewhat outrageous issues interior the call of "protection" or that our civil rights are being taken away. yet, in spite of this, who's going to omit their civil rights? it is unlike they're taking money out of my pocket, surprising? no count number while you're a liberal or a conservative, you ought to be concerned whilst your telephone might desire to be tapped, your emails study, and your abode searched with out the want for only reason. There are people in this us of a who've been imprisoned with out due technique and are being tried with out the spectacular or habeas corpus. enable's end calling one yet another names and understand that the rights that made us all individuals are slipping away surprising in the previous our eyes.

2016-10-18 21:45:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They need to improve ratings, so ultra-conservative media tries to label more liberal media. Most isn't that liberal. Air-America is a good liberal station, very extreme.

2007-03-16 19:10:39 · answer #4 · answered by Kirstin 3 · 0 0

Liberal biased reporting is what right-wing Conservatives calls the media when they don't support their agenda!

2007-03-16 19:09:42 · answer #5 · answered by CxeLady 3 · 1 0

o'reilley is not a news show. he is a commentator that editorializes, not a news reporter.
60 minutes is a news show. remember dan rather's phoney documents that were typed up on ms word supposedly in 1972?

2007-03-16 19:09:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers