English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In my personal opinion,the media has had nothing better to do but to make a big deal about nothing in this case,so,why did they even bother to report anything about it?

To quote a line from a Shakespeare play,it's "much ado about nothing!"

2007-03-16 18:16:18 · 15 answers · asked by auntfran8 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

15 answers

If you're paying very close attention, you can see it's not about nothing. It's a revenge and integrity thing. I am and always have voted pretty conservative, and the Libby/Plame thing is definitely ugly politics. But lying under oath is breaking the law. I vote for people with integrity. I'm paying attention to this. It's not about nothing.

2007-03-16 18:20:43 · answer #1 · answered by DayinthePark 3 · 2 0

Libby was the sacrificial lamb for Rove and Cheney.

At the time her identitiy was revealed, she was working undercover for a contractor, trying to get info concerning Iran's nuclear program.

If you're a CIA operative, and your own government blows your cover, many would consider that treasonous.

Is this "much ado about nothing"? Think again!

2007-03-16 18:22:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Certainly if you consider conspiracy to commit a felony which undercuts the ability of the CIA to fight the war on terror, much ado about nothing. The involvement of the Vice President in this TREASON is certainly trivial too.

2007-03-16 18:37:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I care because - it is just one example among an alarmingly
increasing number of examples of the secretive maneuverings and under-the-table operations of our
administration. The media is making a big deal of it...sure..
just like they do anything else. But, that does not change
the fact that it is a very big deal.

If the White House is willing to expose an under-cover agent
of its very own for political purposes, endangering the very lives of her and her family, does that say anything
about how much they are concerned for the welfare of you
and me?

2007-03-16 18:31:57 · answer #4 · answered by Northwest Womps 3 · 1 1

It is a huge case in this country currently. I wonder are you a registered voter? If you are then you should care this is your country and this was a matter of national securty and could affect your life by the way the goverment deals with their employees

2007-03-16 18:24:49 · answer #5 · answered by investing1987 3 · 1 0

i think of he'd be electable now if he had airtime to furnish extra effective than soundbites. If he had 10 minutes on each and every subject count number - or an uninterupted a million/2 hour of top air time as Obama became given to handle his pastor matters, he might desire to describe how one gets from a to b. a large style of people seem at his end objectives and picture there might only be too plenty disruption, no longer expertise that he has been engaged on those techniques long adequate to have a especially clean concept what might desire to be applied surprising away, and what might desire to be in tiers, etc. inspite of the incontrovertible fact that, if I have been to checklist what he stands for i might arise with a distinctive checklist than yours, different than the liberties and shape section, only using fact the conflict on drugs or maybe the IRS isn't the main important factor to me (even nevertheless i'm pleased with it being part of a equipment.) i do no longer see the IRS being eradicated in 4 years. That takes consensus construction and the 1st step is to shrink spending and get the vested entitlements lower back into the black, getting the babies out of social protection to place their money the place it is going to actual be there for them, to get us out of commerce and different institutions that drain our jobs and components and erode our sovereignity.... i think of Ron Paul might actual be able to diminish taxes, yet removing the IRS altogether only might want a while and music checklist of decrease spending. Ron Paul is obviously the suited candidate, in my opinion, and that i almost did no longer seem into him, in any respect. Had I no longer so disliked the 'substantial' GOP applicants I possibly might by no ability have, given the shortened universal season with front loaded primaries, this year. i do no longer think of it rather is the incorrect message for the time. in actuality, his economics message could no longer be extra well timed given what Bush is making an attempt to do in giving much extra administration to the fed. The message only has to get out in a considerate way, and that takes interest span on the part of those listening. And time alotted in media. -- Mahal, he does not want to get rid of our international militia, he thinks we don't might desire to 'occupy' Europe and Japan to any extent further. there are extremely some info, yet in view that media won't provide him time to communicate them, different than on finance occassionally, all he can furnish is a topic count number sentence. it rather is by no ability going to furnish the info.

2016-10-18 21:42:50 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Media IS reporting about something important; it's about government officials deliberately exposing to danger the lives of those that THEY hired to protect our country!!! If people are supposed to care about whether their President has lied to them about an Affair he had with another woman, then they SHOULD care about something that could get people killed.

2007-03-16 18:26:39 · answer #7 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1 1

You are 100% right--------------there is not enough incentives on this entire planet that could possible entice me into serving in a public office after all the insane sewage tossing like has been done for the past few years.

2007-03-16 18:23:12 · answer #8 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 0 1

I do but not so much for the things that lewis libby was found guilty of.

2007-03-16 18:29:39 · answer #9 · answered by Theodore Sebastian 3 · 0 1

I could care less about her. I watched her today before the committee. She is the biggest liar in the world, besides Clinton that is

2007-03-16 18:21:22 · answer #10 · answered by Kye H 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers