My friends of the evening; So Laar and Milkey Weigh say this is true. Why did the universe cost so much? Wasn't there universal coverage?
2007-03-16 17:25:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I quit smoking 17 years ago,but I still get a great bang for my buck....
2007-03-17 01:38:36 · answer #1 · answered by Einstein 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm no longer able to describe it, and that i do no longer probable comprehend if there is something incorrect with it. i comprehend that as quickly because it replaced into first proposed, many atheist scientists did no longer like it because of the fact it sounded too very like creationism. before the huge Bang concept, they theory the universe replaced into eternal. Now, it is an prevalent concept, from what I hear. Why are scientists so afraid of something that would look like advent? isn't technology a seek for fact, despite in case you do no longer in basic terms like the fact which you stumble on?
2016-10-02 06:31:22 · answer #2 · answered by mayben 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they aren't smokin after a big bang, then I highly doubt cigarettes are required.
2007-03-16 18:05:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your thinking of the Big Bang Threesome.
2007-03-16 17:29:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and a glass of champagne too.
2007-03-16 17:28:51 · answer #5 · answered by Pantherempress 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are we talking republicans and democrates
2007-03-17 01:13:30 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think that it does!
:-)
2007-03-16 17:28:05 · answer #7 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋