2007-03-16 16:59:01 · 11 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/
2007-03-16 17:02:22 · update #1
It was shown he knew about the firings and was part of it, so he should definitely testify. Then everyone should be fired, but I know that won't happen...
2007-03-16 17:02:44 · answer #1 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
the straightforward actuality of the priority is that any President can hearth any US criminal specialist for any reason. The separation of powers is an needed portion of this u . s .'s structure of potential. Bush does now no longer may favor to justify his eliminating of them and Rove received't testify. the priority is being belabored making use of partisan politics. now no longer some other thing beneficial. as well the actual undeniable actuality that apparently dirty it replaced into now no longer unlawful in besides. Congress may favor to spend its time on diverse topics.
2016-12-02 03:07:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The simple fact of the matter is that any President can fire any US attorney for any reason. The separation of powers is an integral part of this nation's structure of power. Bush does not have to justify his removal of them and Rove will not testify.
The issue is being belabored due to partisan politics. Nothing more.
Even though it looks dirty it was not illegal in any way. Congress should spend its time on other things.
2007-03-16 17:09:39 · answer #3 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
If he's in the right, what harm is there? And if he's in the wrong... well... if he doesn't testify he likely won't have any choice in the matter. Can you spell subpoena?
2007-03-16 17:05:09 · answer #4 · answered by mykll42 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Oh yes. I am anxious to see what spews out of that lying fat mouth of his. Without him Dubya might have been better off.
2007-03-16 17:15:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should. Will he? Depends on how tough the Dems can be. I would love to see him led there in handcuffs.
2007-03-16 17:15:47 · answer #6 · answered by realst1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
>Yes! Yes! Pop that zit! Make him squeal like a pig.<
2007-03-16 17:05:33 · answer #7 · answered by Druid 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I guess.
But I'd really prefer to see him hang.
2007-03-16 17:04:08 · answer #8 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
or he can just do it in court when he is tried for leaking plame
2007-03-16 17:29:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes - he certainly should.
2007-03-16 19:30:03 · answer #10 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋