Steve Nash sucks bad! He's at age 33, in his 11th season, and doesn't know how it feels to play in the NBA Finals. The last 2 MVP Awards he won was a GIFT & he didn't deserve them. Steve Nash is straight garbage! He'll never win a title or play in the finals! Nash sucks!
2007-03-16 13:54:38 · 11 answers · asked by jdwj76 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Nash won't get the 3rd in a row. Voters will look and see that the distinction would put him in the company of greats like Larry Bird and realize how ridiculous this is.
Nash is a great player. But the idea that he could win 3 MVPs in a row is almost ludicrous!
I think Kobe should have gotten in last year for his transcendent performance (35 ppg; an 81 point game).
But this year, with Wade out, Lebron James digressing and Kobe's Lakers sucking, it's going to have to go to Dirk.
Dirk Nowitzki, 2006-7 MVP. You can write it down.
2007-03-16 14:25:33 · answer #1 · answered by The Brain 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't like him getting the award either, but I will give him his props. He doesn't play defense, which is the only knock I have on him. I like Kidd a lot better, but then he doesn't really have a outside shot. Some of Nash stats are from the system they run, but most of it is his skill.
Unlike sport announcers I don't believe winning championships determine whether or not your a great player. Stockton and Malone never won championships, but they were both great at their positions.....Bulls fan not Jazz.
Took me a little while to get over it, but I hated the thought of Nash winning three MVP's in a row. Just because the talk of him doing something Jordan didn't do, and somebody probably saying he was better than Mike because he got three straight and Jordan didn't.
Not a James fan, but I think with his stats last year he could have one it.....This year I would say Nash or Dirk should win.
2007-03-16 14:05:30 · answer #2 · answered by mack28 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok i finally realized you know nuthin bout bball.
The reason why the mavs were only a playoff team was because of Don nelson. Nelson has never reached the NBA finals either.
The MVP argument can go on forever. People said shaq and nash the first year...next year was kobe nash and lebron...this year its Dirk and nash.
The suns arent even a playoff team without nash. they went 2-4 this year without him. 2 wins against portland, and a struggling denver.
If you could honestly give me a PG over the last 3 years who has played better than nash and has meant more to his team than anyone i'll stop answering your questions and proving you wrong. (wade is a sg just in case you didnt know that)
2007-03-17 11:47:10 · answer #3 · answered by kevin f 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Steve Nash is great, but 3 consecutive MVP great? I don't know about that! Nash is without question one of the most accurate shooting point guards of all time and as a passer he has very few peers, but he isn't doing anything now that he wasn't doing in Dallas.
With the Suns though he plays in a faster system, with very dependent players and total control of the offense. In Phoenix he has the ball in his hands 100% of the time, in Dallas he played with guys like Nowitzki and Finley, who unlike Marion and Stoudamire can create their own shots consistently. That's why he averaged around 17 points and 8 assist in Dallas, and in Phoenix his numbers inflated to averages of about 20 and 11. Because he makes every single decision on the floor!
But in both cases (Dallas/Phoenix) were contenders or at very least really good teams with Nash at the point. With all the responsibility he has on that team and the winning results they've gotten since acquiring him it's easy for people to pick him as an MVP.
2007-03-16 15:01:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely Rodman replaced right into a seventy two %. draft from the gang,he performed extremely great protection,led the league 7 situations in rebounding,has 5 jewelry is a hall Of Famer.So what do you assume,Nash who hasn't have been given something stable to boot 2 MVPs....... supply me a brake There are couple of gamers who should go into the 50's maximum suitable gamers and hall Of acceptance Shaqulle O'Neal Tim Duncan LeBron James Kobe Bryant Dwayne Wade Dirk Nowitzki Allen Iverson Darko
2016-10-02 06:13:11 · answer #5 · answered by eidemiller 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That a dumb question. He probably didnt deserve the second MVP but he is a great player in terms of Point guards. The nUmber dont lie. 19 points 11 assit. His team aint S H I T without him.
2007-03-16 15:12:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nash ... A great Canadian...Probably better at his game than Gretzky or Lemeuix to hockey
2007-03-16 14:02:53 · answer #7 · answered by wolfwagon2002 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nash makes the players around him better.
Can you say the same about Kobe?
2007-03-16 14:10:13 · answer #8 · answered by rwhz199 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hes good. Heak he is amazing! He is the Tom Brady of basketball. Did you see that comback in overtime to beat the Mavs??
2007-03-16 14:24:17 · answer #9 · answered by J.A. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not so much "great"....hmmm....more like Fantastic...
without Nash the Suns would'nt even be in the playoffs....
with Nash they are a contender!.......almost like Pippen with the Bulls...with PIP, the bulls were great...without PIP...they were losers!
2007-03-16 13:58:17 · answer #10 · answered by Alpha Wolf(Bringer of Rain) 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋