You need to understand something, ask yourself this: Pigs live and roll around in crap. Do pigs think that one another smell bad? No! Of course not! Its how they live, nothing smells bad to them. Now use this example, but substitute "liberals" for "pigs". Liberals thrive on being hypocrates. It is what defines them.
2007-03-16 16:19:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Neither "LIEberal" nor "anti-abortionist" is even a word, so how is it hypocritical or chauvinistic (or even possible) for one nonexistant thing to criticize another?
I fear you are confused by slogans and jargon you can neither escape nor comprehend.
It makes you easy prey, but not much fun.
2007-03-16 13:47:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by oimwoomwio 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
OK, by definition, since you didn't include the Male part: Chauvinism is extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of a group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards a rival group.
...however it doesn't explain the "Hypocrites!" comment.
Both sides of this issue have their nutcases and exteremist.
The argument for late term or partial term abortion is sociopathic.
The argument that there is never a good reason to terminate a pregnancy (to include rape, incest and for the safety of the mother) is unrealistic.
I personally think both sides have issues....'chauvinism' aside.
2007-03-16 13:59:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you're going to use that logic, then any group that disagrees with and/or attacks an opposing group is a chauvinist. And that includes everyone. It includes you. Additionally, it makes this question sort of pointless, doesn't it.
2007-03-16 13:45:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Both sides of the abortion coin have fanatics who act out irrationally...they both are hypocritical...because a pro-lifer who bombs an abortion clinic and kills a doctor is a murder and they say what is what pro-choice people are...so there are hypocrites on that side too!
2007-03-16 13:43:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by i_love_my_mp 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if the anti-abortionist is not a trans-gender person.
2007-03-16 16:36:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well not knowing your situation I can't say. Did they threaten bodily harm? Did they threaten you with hell? Did they call you a slut and threaten to string you up? Did they threaten to blow you up?
These are all things I've heard from anti-abortionist.
And no two wrongs don't make a right.
2007-03-16 13:44:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by actionfolksinger 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh... no. It's called an argument.
What on earth are you on about?
2007-03-16 13:43:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by surroundedbyimbeciles 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you learn a new word? Now learn how to use it correctly.
2007-03-16 13:42:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Cheney and Bush eat our children, and make them come home in body-bags for nothing.
That's what you should be concerned about.
2007-03-16 13:45:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Truth 5
·
1⤊
3⤋