2007-03-16 13:33:50 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jeez you know the answer to that c'mon.
Dont you know why armed robberies go up in the winter?
Cause the liberals spent all their welfare money on their 12 illegitimate kids Christmas they need to make ends meet somehow.
2007-03-16 13:38:39 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Welfare spending is about 16% to individuals, the people you think are getting a free ride, and about 60% to corporations.
Or didn't you know that when Microsoft goes to court in Europe YOU pick up the legal bill?
It called "economic development," Its a tax break that corporations get and the difference between what they owe and what they pay comes from.. guess where... welfare.
The other 24% is administrative costs.
It would be nice if you'd check your facts before you get on here and let Limbaugh make a fool of you
2007-03-16 20:46:01 · answer #2 · answered by fredrick z 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's funny, Dubya had 4 years with a Red house and senate and managed to get nothing done on welfare. Meanwhile he also did nothing to penalize companies that hire illegal aliens, his philosophy is make them all citizens so we can put 6 million of them on welfare immediately.
It's hard to get these things done when you work 3 days a week and spend much of your time on golfing vacations. I'd say that spending 300 billion dollars on Iraq is foreign welfare. And you retards still use that stupid old argument? Wake up folks!
2007-03-16 20:46:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually, welfare spending (like federal spending generally) is much, much higher in the red states, especially south of the Mason-Dixon line.
Moreover, I'm a bit concerned by the contemptuous attitude to the poor that American conservatives express. Especially given that it is the American working class that votes Republicans in time after time.
2007-03-16 20:38:44 · answer #4 · answered by surroundedbyimbeciles 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
All of Congress is on welfare. They don't work and need to sponge to stay in office long enough to retire millionaires. If you paid a congressperson for what they for this country that was positive, they would all be paupers
2007-03-16 20:56:03 · answer #5 · answered by gyro-nut64 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's quite sad how some folks see the world in wild extremes of 'lib' and 'con'.
Your question isn't worth an answer...it would only perpetuate the narrow minded scope in which you framed it.
Here's a better one....
why do people who don't grasp politics insist in describing it through comical extremes?
2007-03-17 02:05:52 · answer #6 · answered by M B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
with all the cuts the republicans want to make in support for the nations lower class it probly wont exist much longer. or medicaid for that matter. where are those pesky w.m.d. that we went to war for anyway.
2007-03-16 20:46:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are liberals and conservatives in every socioeconomic class. You prove yourself to be a fool by trying to imply otherwise.
2007-03-16 20:40:22 · answer #8 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
ON my couch, telling me to share my food and money because I'm rich. Using my computer to blog how unfair the world is that people like me have so much more .
DAng, I work all they, why can't someone other than me wash the dishes?
2007-03-16 20:41:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
So are corporations liberal? They get a lot of welfare.
2007-03-16 20:42:26 · answer #10 · answered by Cerulean 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋