It has a high correlation with ability in normal chess. Top speed players have been Bobby Fischer and Vishy Anand and they are/were also at the top in normal chess.
2007-03-16 22:29:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nick 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Go to a chess club and you will find speed chess played at rates from fifteen minutes per game down to one minute with five minutes being the most common form. Lightning or Rapid Transit chess requires a person to move every ten seconds when a buzzer goes off. This form is rare today as personal integrity in the USA is on a fast decline and cheating a rampant.
2007-03-18 05:27:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The main thing is learning not winning. Best if opponent is of similar strength. Speed chess is ok if you have increment at least 2sec per move. Otherwise you run into idiots who play fast moves to win on time with a lost position. Even 3 2 is a better time limit than 4 0. You can't stop software cheats so only play for fun. A lot of these blitz players would be stronger if they played slower games and bothered to study them
2014-12-17 01:06:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by javaNoob 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the main useful piece is the queen and then the rooks. particular if the king is checkmated it rather is the tip of the recreation, yet it extremely isn't correct to actual play as regards 'useful'. grimy chess, wtf, no person thinks that way. Chess has strict policies on the way it is play, each and every little element has a rule. You play interior the policies or are barred from enjoying. And that is going for the video games interior the park and interior the coffee residences. and you play to win, no longer play stupid buggers. So why under sell for a stalemate? Which by the form might have you ever disqualified in a experience interior the authentic international. speed chess? You mean 5 or 10 minute lightening / blitz or the 30 minute speedy? i'm aggressive participant so I desire the speedier video games. And as for the different answer approximately bringing the king out early to marvel and awe opponent duh. Kings pop out after the queens are long gone, and function a capability resembling a N or B.
2016-10-18 21:16:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 and 2 minute Chess is called lightning Chess. For a game to be speed chess it would have to be say at least 5 minutes.
The reason why People play at these fast time controls is
because it's next to impossible to get a game of standard
chess or even 10.0 because of rampant cheating with
sophisticated programs mind you that cheaters can play
at very fast time controls because they purchase bots that can make moves from Rybka and Fritz at 0.01 seconds without a human entering the move to the Computer manually in another window.
The point of it all is ego to knock Players down they have
no chance in hell of beating unarmed with these things.
2007-03-18 14:03:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that a ten minute game of chess is "speed chess."
The 1 minute variety is an exercise in survival unless both players are good at chess (expert or better).
2007-03-16 14:05:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mr. G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Speed chess is chess but just played with a different strategy. I know a lot of good players who prefer speed to normal
2007-03-19 16:11:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by focker6880 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, at least 10 minutes is fair to me
the real chess players have games of hours but even for a blitz... i dont understand how can you play in 1-3 minutes, i think the winner is the guy who moves faster regardless of what happens in the game
2007-03-16 13:42:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Theta40 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a different style... that's for sure. You just gotta play the position that moment... don't look to far ahead or you're gonna waste time!
2007-03-16 13:38:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by theoryofgame 7
·
0⤊
0⤋