English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That being the case... How come LIEberals and Taliberals target unborn children instead of the terrorists?

(I realize my initial questions ends in a preposiston. Please, no ad hominems based on grammar or spelling.)

Opinions?

2007-03-16 12:55:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

People never get tired of making irrational comparisons.

The pro-choice issue has nothing to do with whether abortion is good, or whether unborn children are bad.

The pro-choice issue is solely about who makes medical decisions -- the individual or the government.

2007-03-16 13:01:01 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4 0

Fair enough. No ad hominems based on grammar or spelling. However, ad hominems based on the fact that you are friggin moron are a GO!!
You can't tell the difference between Iraq and terrorism. It's not the same thing. You conshitatives need to put your resources in better places than Iraq if you want to fight terrorism. Think of all the unborn children our occupation in Iraq as ended up killing. You don't really care about children Norm, you just care about hatred and paranoia.

2007-03-16 20:20:47 · answer #2 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 0 0

Take into consideration that Muslims are against abortion as well. They actually convict women for getting pregnant, if they are raped...and call it adultery. Then they sentence the woman to die, but she has to carry the baby fullterm. Nigeria is lethal about this sort of thing.

First of all, your avatar implies that you are a male. While I will agree that you are entitled to your opinion, I also believe, that until you have walked in someone else's shoes, not to predetermine how they make choices in their life.

While I would never have an abortion, I would never tell someone else that they can't have an abortion, especially in the cases of incest, rape, life endangerment, or mental endangerment.

I agree that if the US society is given a foot, they tend to take a mile. If it's legal to drink, we become alcoholics; if it's legal to smoke, we become nicotine puff people. My primary objection is the abuse of any given law. If only the victims of incest, rape, life endangerment, or mental endangerment were the ones having abortions, would you be so greatly offended by the legalization?

On the other hand, I have seen parents light up cigarettes in front of their kids; drive their cars like maniacs with their kids unstrapped in the back seat, would you consider this any different? These parents say it is their right to raise their children the way they want to raise them. Seems to me, the lives of these children were probably better off ending in the womb.

Sorry, am in one of my more blah moods.

2007-03-16 20:06:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because most unborn children that are to die will cause pain to the underage women of the country thus draining our Social Security our economy our workforce and out image. Terrorists are a persistent problem that are being taken care of, but the pro-choice/life debate is all over the news because of human interest stories.

2007-03-16 19:59:37 · answer #4 · answered by Dillon W 2 · 0 0

I'm with you Norm, I just want to point out to "DiIlon" above, that the unborn child causing the mother pain could bring someone else joy. It is called adoption. Abortion hurts the unborn child and it's mother (and father, if he's aware) in the long run. It really is a no-win situation.

2007-03-16 20:06:51 · answer #5 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 0 0

Liberals don't target unborn children. Liberals want to make sure women are not made into criminals for terminating their pregnancies. Liberals want to see terrorists prosecuted and thrown in jail like the scumbags they are. They do not want to see terrorists idolized because everyone in their home country thinks they stood up to US torture and abuse. That is why we try to stop torture and abuse and shine light on the practices that take away our moral high ground.

2007-03-16 20:05:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually I dont have those numbers with me right now but I will look around to find out when the last time a fetus participated in a terrorist act.

2007-03-16 20:21:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe you mean a fetus and the answer is never. A fetus does not even know what a plane or building is let alone be able to fly or destroy one, respectively. Try to be a little more honest and genuine when phrasing your question, otherwise you may be accused of whining or crying.

2007-03-16 20:06:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I've known quite a few Republican women who have gotten abortions. One used to have anti-abortion bumper stickers all over her car that disappeared a while after she herself had an abortion. Funny how that works.

I can imagine why you have no idea that this goes on. I think your Republican woman friends think it's best that you remain in the dark.

2007-03-16 19:59:05 · answer #9 · answered by Cerulean 3 · 2 0

To date they havent but why risk it. Democracy must be defended and you never really knbow what the unborn are capable of.

Last I heard Bush was committing extra troops!

2007-03-16 20:52:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers