The Nevada Democratic Party's decision to break its presidential debate partnership with Fox has really stung the so called "news network".
Morton Kondracke completely lost it while discussing the snub and compared Nevada Democrats to communist propagandists.
Bill O'Reilly went one better and likened the "radical" Nevada voters to Nazis.
Fox News does not want to be in a fight about whether it's a legitimate news organization. Why? Because Fox News can't take a punch.
2007-03-16 12:14:12 · 12 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wouldn't have a problem with this network if they left the word "news" out of their network name and their program names.
Their programming is related to news the way goldfish are related to bicycles. It is, purely and simply, a propaganda organ for the Bush administration. That would be OK if they would just own up to it.
John Edwards started the Nevada situation by refusing to attend, and I'm glad someone is finally telling the truth about this network.
2007-03-16 12:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
I often find it entertaining to see that the only response from FOX News enthusiasts is that "it's the number #1 news network."
The top rated television programme in the U.S. is "American Idol," but that doesn't mean that it is providing its audience with any substantive factual or news-worthy information.
FOX News is Rupert Murdoch's brilliant invention, intended to appeal to a demographic that is either unwilling or incapable of ingesting fair journalism.
FOX News has no foreign bureaus, and it seldom generates any news on its own account. It is mostly a collection of commentators and headline summaries. It is, at best, "news entertainment."
2007-03-16 19:30:28 · answer #2 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm glad you are real concerned over the issue as you should be. The Democrats (Freakin commies) have proven to the country that they can't stand up to any REAL questions about their political positions. Just look at how the liar Clinton went ballistic when Chris Wallace asked him if he did all he could do about terrorism. It's an age old tactic, the minute your put on an indefensible position...go on offense. The only problem is that Clinton looked like the loose cannon that he is.
2007-03-16 19:28:18 · answer #3 · answered by Delphi 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The left has used names like nazi to refer to almost anyone they dislike, including our president. Good for Fox News, they have no reason to argue a point that has no merit. Fox news is the most legitimate news organization if for no other reason, they don,t have thier content edited by the Clintons.
2007-03-16 19:23:23 · answer #4 · answered by Papa Joe 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well, since it is the number 1 cable network for news, I don't really think it will be such a big deal in the end. I guess Dems don't like be called Nazis though they often enjoy calling others the word.
2007-03-16 19:22:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I bet ol' Falafel went apopleptic. Couldn't happen to a better sham outfit.
2007-03-16 19:17:14 · answer #6 · answered by Cerulean 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
How many Dems are there in NV?
In other words, why the big deal?
2007-03-16 19:19:06 · answer #7 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, everything will be fine at FOX but I think it is sweet for you to be concerned. You are a good person.
2007-03-16 19:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
the big cheese knows best
2007-03-16 19:17:17 · answer #9 · answered by josh s 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes it happened when they slipped on a banana!
2007-03-16 19:18:31 · answer #10 · answered by Surfer Dude 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋