On the grounds that people found in a family tomb who were not related by blood probably were married. In fact, it proves only that the person whose remains were found in the ossuary marked "Jesus, son of Joseph" was not related by blood to the person in the supposed "Mary Magdalene" ossuary.
2007-03-16 11:56:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Religion or should I say god and the venue one believes him through is simply mans attempt to answer difficult questions and only having limited knowledge to do it through. In christanity Jesus was a preacher who when talking to his flock used palor tricks to capture their attention. - Walk on order - try a sandbar
Finding evidence of Jesus's grave being proved is sketchy at best asnd still the fact remains his real life doings are sketchy at best. His accounts have been embelesh as they have been re-told.
If one looks in to the strings theory - one sees the formulation of what is and has always been; is that everything that exist from matter to an moving autombile to self awarness is just a different form of energy. What is water? Is it a solid = ice? is it the liquid we = drink or is it a gas, be it steam,or vapor. Make water real cold and the molecule break down to its elements, but really all it is, is water and thinking real tiny it is made of atoms which are made of sub atomic particles like protons and electrons and these are made of gluons and photons and down in size to strings - at some point we see matter for what it is, just a form of energy. This energy is just oscillating frequencies that we percieve as reality. Think of the Time Square building with its belt of light bulbs going on and off creating a pattern that we read as the news scrolling around it. All it is, is sequencing of photons and we think we have reality.
Does the reality of god or jesus or anything have any more credence than just some radio wave of energy that we try to assign as real logical manifestation of something we call matter
2007-03-16 18:50:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We talked about this in my archaeology class, and I'll try to remember exactly what my prof. said.
They didn't do enough DNA tests. They only tested a couple of the remains. They should have tested all of them, but they didn't.
The remains were dug up several years ago by archaeologists, studied and reburied in a mass grave according to the laws in that area. So we can't go back and get more DNA. If there was a possibility of anything interesting being found there, the archaeologests would have published the results, not the journalists.
The ones producing the show and doing the tests were journalists, NOT scientists. When challenged on their results, they shrugged their shoulders and said that they were "journalists, not archaeologists."
Jesus and Mary were common names then.
My instructor even said that this could be considered "psuedoscience".
I need more evidence to back up their claims. Show me more DNA test results!!! Less story telling and more proof please!!
2007-03-16 12:08:25 · answer #2 · answered by nokhada5 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If there were no bones found then why do they call the boxes " bone boxes" ? Did they have Jesus' DNA pryer to finding these boxes and if so how? Where did they get it and if not then how can they prove it is his if there is nothing to compare too ?Sorry im asking so many questions. Maybe i shouldve submitted this as a Question.
2007-03-16 12:15:38 · answer #3 · answered by shannon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Moot factor. The Gnostic gospels are crammed with fake counsel. they are actually not inspired writings, in any respect - no longer Spirit inspired, besides. pondering Jesus' undertaking and ministry in the international, it does not be logical for Him to take a spouse, besides. so some distance as companionship is going, there have been additionally 12 men who went everywhere with Him, to boot many different disciples, the two men and girls. Mary gets some spotlight because of the fact Jesus further and healed her in a great way. She replaced right into a follower out of love and very much of gratitude. there replaced into no romance.
2016-10-02 06:06:34 · answer #4 · answered by barbary 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when do we have the DNA of Jesus or any of his relatives to even be able to prove either way who the bodies were. furthermore, the bodies were found 20 years ago and the discover claimed that they did not belong to Jesus of Nazareth
2007-03-16 13:20:20 · answer #5 · answered by Mike J 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unless someone sneezed. Seriously, there's a lot of effort involved in preventing contamination when ancient artifacts are to be tested for DNA. If Cameron's studies could have passed a peer review, he would be writing papers for scientific journals instead of articles for tabloids.
2007-03-16 12:05:40 · answer #6 · answered by anywherebuttexas 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jesus rose from the Dead, and none of His bones can be found anywhere.
Cameron is a bloody moron, who like to make $$$$ off of his own delusional out look on life. $$$$ is Cameron's only proof-of-life.
2007-03-16 12:12:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How does DNA evidence prove marriage?
2007-03-16 12:00:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was no DNA evidence because the were no bones found.
2007-03-16 12:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by October 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋