probably the fact that she broke up a marriage to get what she wants. i don't care what people say...there is a reason jennifer aniston won't speak to her! You know she can still adopt and raise children being single...she doesn't have to take another womans man to do it. And her and the billy bob thorton thing was creepy! who keeps each others blood in necklace and buys each other burial plots as a present...creepy!!
2007-03-16 10:56:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
This is a woman who hasn't spoken to her father (Jon Voight) for many years; and walks out of events if he's there. Why? Because he left her mother for another woman.
I always wonder whether these stars who adopt but then have children, eg Ang & Brad, Tom Cruise will leave the same amount of their money to all the children.
Many 30/40s Hollywood stars/singers adopted. Joan Crawford adopted five children, (one was luckily retrieved by the birth mother). According to one daughter's book she was abusive; she was left nothing in Joan's multi-million dollar will (or her brother, and the two younger daughters a few thousand dollars).
By the way, where have all the little doggies actors/popstars used to always carry under their arms/handbags (even to restaurants/award shows)?
2007-03-16 18:37:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Birbeck 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ahh, let her do what she's gonna do. She's making a difference in atleast 4 children's lives for the better. Atleast they're not stuck in some 3rd world orphanage....
However, she can't be all that great or she wouldn't have had an affair with Brad Pitt...hmm.
At any rate, it's all just good PR. She's raking in the dough, whether she's moral or not.
Personally I think she's doing all of it b/c she feels empty/ guilty inside & is to trying to fill the void with good deeds. I sorta feel sorry for her.
Stars will be stars...
2007-03-16 17:42:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Samantha 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I am not crazy about her either, why can't she adopt a child from the United States-there are orphans here too. She is also a homewrecker.
2007-03-16 18:10:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Urchin 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Publicity baby, publicity, in the news today she apologised to her new Vietnamese son for bringing him into this kind of life because of the media frenzy when they brought him out....like she didn't know that was going to happen? come on she knew full well and thrives on it
2007-03-16 19:46:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheatreFan 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Shes like jsut pefect... She said she would give up her carreer to be a full time mother <<< for an multi famous actress to say this is quite cool
2007-03-16 18:29:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♣Kermit the Frog♣ 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I just think if shes taking some poor child out of poverty and can give them an excellent standard of life, who are we to dislike her.
2007-03-16 17:48:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
most celebs do this sort of stuff to get in the limelight but i hear she is putting her career on hold to look after her adopted kids so it seems like she is genuine
2007-03-16 17:38:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by QPRfan 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Its called jealousy........ I too am a fellow sufferer
I don't want 'rainbow' children
I just want Brad Pitt!!
2007-03-16 18:48:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by JJ J 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
better future for the kids
2007-03-16 18:32:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by briggs 5
·
1⤊
2⤋