Now, you are starting to wise up.
We are way behind the Red States in logical thinking.
2007-03-16 09:03:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by wolf 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
But aren't you, in effect, asking us to make global political and environmental decisions based on Al Gore's book deal?
Help me understand the difference.
2007-03-16 16:22:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It keeps you in things to carp and complain about, doesn't it? We move to stop atrocities and you complain that we have no business there. We don't move to stop atrocities and you complain that we should have moved to put a halt to them.
Last I heard salmon are declining because more people are eating them and their eggs. Solution: Blow up dams equipped with salmon ladders which were built for flood control and hydroelectric power.
Wail on . . . . .
2007-03-16 16:24:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Helmut 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but you have to admit, Al Gore lives in a glass house, metaphorically speaking.
2007-03-16 16:07:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No we should make all global politics based on money like it is now!!!! $$$$$$$$
2007-03-16 16:11:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by ATL 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer to consult tea leaves.
2007-03-16 16:10:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by VoodooPunk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is a bit distracting. I understand what you're saying.
2007-03-16 16:11:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Matt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
By all means, let's ignore reality and attack the messenger of the bad news!
2007-03-16 16:01:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
millions die in the congo.
WHERE IS THE U.N. REPONSIBLITY
why is it our problem ? it's a world problem!
2007-03-16 16:06:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by MR TADS 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
go shake the Limbaugh webs out of your head,,
2007-03-16 16:02:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋