English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-16 08:42:57 · 5 answers · asked by panthrchic 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Sure "D"- We spend so much time here defending our "groups" that all that is accomplished is more hate, more anger, more determination to eliminate the other....Im not innocent either! But I am ready to see some unity rather than a war in our own country, against each other.

2007-03-16 08:51:29 · update #1

5 answers

Yes, that is a wonderful idea. Moderates in the United States should vote in record breaking numbers and save the nation from the fringe groups on both sides.

We are a nation of more than 300,000,000 people, and it's time for us to grow up. Insane anarchists and stoneage conservatives must be curbed, and soon.

2007-03-16 08:49:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Then act by voting for Ron Paul (R) in 2008.

Voting independent won't change a thing, cause you won't be able to gather the necessary amount of support for a candidate to beat the system. Therefore, voting independent can only hurt your cause. It's sad, but it's the truth.

I see only two possibilities. One is voting for Ron Paul (R), a true libertarian and a real paleo-conservative. Even though it doesn't necessarily do any good for the independent parties, at least it would be a step towards restoring some honesty and integrity in the White House and getting rid of corporate control of America, which includes the mainstream media. Eventually, the mainstream media is what the independents will need if they want any real power. But in corporately controlled America, the mainstream press will never give independent parties a fair amount of attention.

Another possibility would be for independent parties to unite for one election, and form a common platform bent on reforming the current two-party system. And then have their voters gather around one candidate. Of course, this would've been a very limited platform, since it would've been impossible to agree on much more than just this one common goal. And then, if they were to win, go though with reforming the two-party system, and then call out a new election, each party for itself again. It should be possible to agree on something like that, but I don't see it happening though. It just sounds too far fetched.

Actually, there is a third possibility. And that is to just continue with what you've been doing so far. Stay divided and few, basically keep banging your heads against the wall. Leave politics to the "liberal vs. conservative" barking contest, which only purpose is to distract people from the real issues, like the hijacking of the republic by a shadow government that controls both parties and the mainstream press through powers given to them in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the National Security Act of 1947.

2007-03-16 09:12:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.

I'll act by voting for every independent that I can.

Republican and Democrat mean absolutely the same thing to me. Incompetent.

2007-03-16 08:47:03 · answer #3 · answered by davethenayber 5 · 0 0

at least we should start getting ready for the fight.

2007-03-16 10:04:36 · answer #4 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 0 0

Care to be more specific?

2007-03-16 08:46:28 · answer #5 · answered by Dangerous Dave 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers