Clinton? Obama? Gulliani? Rice?.....
2007-03-16 07:26:07 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Of that list I would have to say Gulliani. For a few reasons. 1 he was thier on 9/11 he knows what happened on that day beter than most people do in the US. And he knows what needs to be done. 2. While he was the mayor things were going rather good in NY, I think people need to see this and disregard if u like President Bush, Republicans, or the War in Iraq and realise that What Gulliani did in NY can transfer over in the white house and help the economy with out hurting the war effort or the security of the country,
Rice would be my second pick. She also understands the secruity issues that face the country but her area of expertice is in Security not economy and everything else I dont think she would be as good. But one major pluss with her wold be her ability to smooth things over with a right now tension filled relationship with russia. I would rather see her in the VP position.
Obama is the only democrat I would be some what able to conside to. I dont know much about him but his popularity would be good for the country right now.
Clinton shouldnt even be able to run, nor should Edwards or Kerry. The left wing is a discrase to the democrats and to the US as a whole, they win the world will end.
2007-03-16 07:40:15 · answer #1 · answered by rkjr1999 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well I'd really like to see John Cox win, but realistically he isn't going to win the primary. That being the case I am rooting for Mitt Romney. But really Gulliani has the best chance of beating the dems, so I am very split and am excited to see who wins the primary, and who is selected for vice president. I will vote for the winner.
2007-03-16 08:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by geevs80 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of the above. None have offered a shred of substance to their campaign in coming up with answers/solutions to any of the problems America is faced with today, i.e. how to get out of Iraq, rising cost of healthcare, etc.
The only candidate who has come up with solutions to these and other problems facing the next president is John Edwards. He is the only candidate of substance right now. Read some of the articles I've listed below and you'll see what I mean...
2007-03-16 08:19:21 · answer #3 · answered by JoJo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In order of preference:
1. Ron Paul
2. Rudy Giuliani
3. Mitt Romney
4. Duncan Hunter
5. J.D. Hayworth (if he were running)
2007-03-16 07:32:31 · answer #4 · answered by Biz Iz 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul is the only Republican I'd consider.
I used to be a fan of John McCain..but he's turned into quite the Bush 'suck up' lately.
If Ron doesn't get the nomination....I'll vote Obama.
2007-03-16 09:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by M B 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gulliani all the way you see him on SNL hilarious !
2007-03-16 07:44:11 · answer #6 · answered by Wonderingplz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'll hold out hope that Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun, George Patton, or Augustus Caeser returns from the dead and runs for president.
2007-03-16 07:31:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Those candidates suck. Ron Paul, TomTancredo, or Duncan Hunter.
2007-03-16 07:50:06 · answer #8 · answered by jason s 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fred Thompson. A breath of fresh air.
2007-03-16 08:16:37 · answer #9 · answered by Joe Q 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama
2007-03-16 07:32:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋