English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i dont think i would.

2007-03-16 06:39:49 · 47 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

oh and im a woman. i still wouldnt vote for her.

2007-03-16 06:46:21 · update #1

47 answers

If i had to choose between Hillary and
A) Howard Stern,
B) Charles Manson,
C) Paris Hilton
D) Tom Cruise
E) Rosie O'Donnell
F) Marilyn Manson
G) Gene Simmons
H) Ted Kennedy
I) all my ex-girlfriends
J) Jessica Simpson
and natually
K) OJ Simpson

ALL ROLLED UP INTO ONE AZZHOLE CANDIDATE??

I would STILL not vote for her.

2007-03-16 06:44:44 · answer #1 · answered by JusticeManEsq 5 · 3 3

All the well informed citizens. Those who care about the USA, the environment, good jobs, and are committed not to send are troops to fight unnecessary wars. Yes, these are the people who will be voting for Hillary Clinton in 2008. It might take awhile to undo the mess that Bush has gotten this country into, but Hillary has the know how and will prevail.

2007-03-16 06:50:01 · answer #2 · answered by sparks 7 · 0 1

I hope I don't have to.

It'll depend on who wins the democratic and republican nominations though.

I'm a registered independent - I vote for the candidate, but the '08 republican candidate would have to probably kick dubya in the nuts personally to win my vote after all the BS the GOP has pulled in the last six years (and for years before that too).

2007-03-16 06:44:51 · answer #3 · answered by joemammysbigguns 4 · 2 0

A WHOLE bunch of women. In case you haven't noticed, the majority of voters pick their president for many bad reasons. Many women will vote for her simply because she is a woman, just like many black people will vote for a black candidate, simply based on race. People voted for George Bush because he seemed like a "nice good ole boy." The people who actually pick their candidate based on what kind of job they will do are few and far between.

2007-03-16 06:44:03 · answer #4 · answered by yodadoe 4 · 5 0

I would. I would have to see who she was going against and look at both sides carefully. But I wouldn't just not vote for her b/c she's a Clinton or b/c she's a female.

2007-03-16 06:46:14 · answer #5 · answered by charlie 4 · 0 2

I would, I will and I am going to. Mrs. Clinton and her office did not hesitate to help my family when our little one was snached by a drug dealer and transported across state lines, not one New York male politician lifted a finger, just sent polite "So Sorry" letters. Mrs. Clinton and her staff reacted....actions speak louder than words.

2007-03-16 06:43:47 · answer #6 · answered by LoneStarLou 5 · 3 1

No.
We have far better ones to vote for now.
I think the Clintons have done enough damage to the DNC.

2007-03-16 06:45:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

if she is the better runner we are all screwed.... I hate all this politicians. They all are rich and most only realy care how to get more money.... " who wants a raise in pay" one congressman asks... "ay" they all say. Who controls them? Why do they get raises while our economy is failing and the national debt is growing. Make the have pay cuts

2007-03-16 06:47:51 · answer #8 · answered by Freq, Grandparent of Y!A 4 · 2 0

The government would first have to put sensor tags on all the White House lenin, drapes, furniture and any thing else that's not nailed down-you know, those tags that stores put on clothes to catch shoplifters?

2007-03-16 06:47:40 · answer #9 · answered by mark747 4 · 2 1

If I could vote, I wouldn't. Not because she's a woman or anything, but because I don't think she's a stable decision maker.

2007-03-16 06:44:43 · answer #10 · answered by I 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers